For One Small Device Company, A Big Company IP Strategy

Unlike many small medical device companies, Arthrocare insists it can implement an aggressive IP enforcement strategy because it has built a strong patent network around fundamentally new technology. Not only do the lawsuits stop patent infringers, they also give Arthrocare leverage it needs to initiate cross-licensing and licensing deals, gaining access to other important technologies. But inherent in this approach is a risk: uncertainty.

For the third time in just about as many years, ArthroCare Corp. , developers of the innovative Coblationtechnology used in orthopedic and a variety of other clinical applications, has sued a significantly larger rival, alleging patent infringement. ArthroCare's latest target: arthroscopy leader Smith & Nephew Dyonics Inc. , a division of Smith & Nephew PLC .

No one's keeping records, but ArthroCare's aggressive patent defense surely must place it among the most active small device companies in its willingness to pursue IP enforcement actions. ArthroCare CEO Mike Baker wouldn't comment on the pending litigation. "As a matter of company policy, we never talk about enforcement actions," he says

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Medtech Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Legal & IP

State And International Enforcement Agencies May Step Up Amid Uncertain Federal Environment

 
• By 

States and international regulatory bodies may increase their US enforcement role following federal staff cuts, Hyman Phelps & McNamara attorneys said in a recent webinar. The attorneys also expect False Claims Act enforcement and public health to remain key areas of focus at the federal level.

FDA And Boston Scientific Face Legal Action Over Spinal Device Safety

 
• By 

A patient, Dena Lawler, is suing Boston Scientific and the US FDA over alleged harm from a spinal stimulator device. Lawler claims inadequate regulatory review allowed dangerous modifications to the device, which then caused her pain and other health issues. She is calling for reconsideration of the device approvals.

California Medtech Firms Resolve Patent Dispute Over Delivery Catheters

 

Route 92 says it has reached a settlement with Q’Apel Medical over patent claims concerning its Tenzing delivery catheters.

US Medtech Tariffs: How Will EU Navigate Unchartered Territory?

 

US President Trump has imposed sweeping tariffs that encompass medtech. These are expected to drive up costs, disrupt supply chains and hinder innovation, likely driving the EU to seek new trade partnerships to mitigate the impact.

More from Policy & Regulation

MedTech Europe’s Bisazza Urges Action As US Tariffs Jeopardize Critical Global Supply Chains

 

The intricate assembly of medical devices, often involving over 1,000 globally sourced components, faces severe disruption due to new US tariffs. These barriers could halt production and devastate small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), MedTech Europe’s CEO, Oliver Bisazza, warns in an interview with Medtech Insight.

Beyond The Bladder: Incontinence Impacts Mental Health

 

In recognition of Mental Health Awareness month, Sarah Jenkins, executive director at the National Association for Continence, discussed the mental health issues that often come with incontinence.

AI Rollout Aims To Accelerate FDA’s Product Review Process

 
• By 

The FDA plans to implement artificial intelligence in its scientific review process by 30 June, following a successful pilot. The agency hopes the tool will reduce nonproductive tasks for reviewers amid recent staff cuts. A Chief AI Officer will oversee the rollout and integration.