The SHARP “Approval”: Merck Gets Vytorin Labeling Change, But Not The CV Outcomes Claim It Sought

FDA opted against a new indication for the ezetimibe/simvastatin combination because the SHARP trial in chronic kidney disease patients did not assess the independent contributions of each drug on the observed effect. There was no indication at a November advisory committee review that issues related to the “combination rule” would pose a barrier to a new claim.

FDA’s recent decision to add the results of the SHARP study in chronic kidney disease patients to the labeling for Merck & Co. Inc.’s Vytorin (ezetimibe/simvastatin), but not to allow a claim for cardiovascular risk reduction based upon those results, begs the regulatory question of what constitutes an “approval.”

The regulatory action on Vytorin, which was preceded by an advisory committee review of the SHARP data and Merck’s request...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Post-Marketing Regulation & Studies

After Sarepta Reversed Course On Elevidys, Could An Adcomm Be Next?

 

One option for the FDA going forward could be holding an advisory committee meeting on its safety concerns after Sarepta agreed to stop all shipments of its DMD gene therapy.

Sarepta Refuses To Stop Elevidys Shipments After Third Death Linked To Gene Therapy Vector

 
• By 

Sarepta knew about the death in a Phase I trial of SRP-9004 for LGMD when it recently revealed a restructuring plan, but did not disclose the event. The now-discontinued gene therapy candidate uses the same AAV vector as Elevidys, which has been linked to two DMD patient deaths.

US FDA Advisory Committee Supports Vaccine Safety, Scrutinizes AE Reporting Quality

 
• By 

The Pediatric Advisory Committee supported routine safety monitoring for three vaccines and 21 drugs, but the panel’s consumer representative said adverse event reporting needs improvement and FDA literature reviews should include lawsuits as well as social media.

CAR-T REMS Removal Should Boost Access, But Long-Term Follow-Up, Black Box Remain

 

The REMS removal and labeling changes should open up CAR-T treatment to many more US patients, although other regulatory hurdles and safety language that experts had wanted removed still stand.

More from Product Reviews

Blenrep Review Highlights US FDA Oncology Trial Site Selection, Comparator Issues

 
• By 

The FDA will take a hard line on trial design and site selection to ensure applicability to the US, Oncology Center of Excellence Director Richard Pazdur said during a meeting on GSK's Blenrep.

EMA Poised To Decide On Fate Of Lilly’s Kisunla And PharmaMar’s Aplidin In EU

 
• By 

Eli Lilly and PharmaMar were set to make their case before the European Medicines Agency this week as part of re-examination procedures for their respective drugs Kisunla and Aplidin.

Complete Response Letter Trio Raises Prospect Of Tidal Shift In Regenerative Medicine Regulation

 

Replimune's RP1 oncolytic immunotherapy became the third regenerative medicine to receive an FDA complete response letter this month as the agency appears to re-visit previous agreements about accelerated approval.