Belgium To Test Parallel Review Of Clinical Trial Dossiers Ahead Of New Regulation

Belgium is following the footsteps of Germany and France by launching a pilot to develop and test procedures for the coming EU Clinical Trial Regulation, which requires national competent authorities and ethics committees to evaluate trial dossiers in parallel and to issue a consolidated single decision within short timelines.

Belgium’s Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products is preparing to launch a pilot later this year under which it plans to review clinical trial applications in parallel with national ethics committees and within the strict timeframes specified in the upcoming EU Clinical Trials Regulation.

The FAMHP explained that while the voluntary pilot would be conducted under Belgium’s current national clinical trials legislation of May 7, 2004, the evaluation of clinical trial dossiers included in the pilot “would follow the spirit” of the CTR that is set to come into force in October 2018

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Clinical Trials

More from R&D

Unlocking Opportunities: How To Engage With The EMA On Animal Testing Alternatives

 

The European Medicines Agency, like its counterpart in the US, is increasingly focusing on the use of alternatives to animal testing.

EU Pharma Reform: Exclusivity Vouchers Alone Are Insufficient Incentive For Antimicrobials, Industry Says

 

European pharma trade associations EFPIA and EUCOPE outline their respective views on how the EU’s pharma legislation overhaul should tackle antimicrobial resistance, and why transferable exclusivity vouchers alone will not suffice as incentives.

What The EMA Can Teach HTA Bodies About Joint Clinical Assessments

 

EU-level joint clinical assessments conducted under the Health Technology Assessment Regulation need to be more flexible when it comes to evidence requirements, according to experts speaking at a gene and cell therapy conference.