1. HBW Insight
  2. >>Beauty
  3. >>Policy & Regulation
  4. >>Legal

Reverse Engineering Can Be Least Of Fragrance IP Worries

 
• By Ryan Nelson

Reverse-engineering a fragrance to uncover trade secrets at least takes time and resources, unlike instances where a former employee simply delivers them to a competitor. The EU's provisional trade-secret directive will promote improved protections against such conduct but will not affect laws of contract, so confidentiality agreements will remain important tools to guard against trade-secret misappropriation.

If reverse engineering represents the biggest threat to trade secrets under a provisional European Union directive, that stands to be a substantial improvement on the status quo.

The fragrance industry, with its heavy reliance on trade secrets, recognizes the value of reverse engineering as long as the...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on HBW Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required
Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber?

More from Legal

Producers Sue Oregon Over ‘Crushing’ EPR Recycling Law, Call It Unconstitutional

 
• By Eileen Francis

A national wholesalers’ trade group is suing Oregon, claiming its EPR law, which requires producers to register, report packaging data and pay fees, is unconstitutional and overly burdensome.

‘Off-Label’ Beauty Hacks: Navigating the Risks of Consumer-Driven Innovation

 
• By Rachel Raphael, Elizabeth Bresnahan and Kathryn Ignash

Guest authors Rachel Raphael, partner at Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP and associates at the firm, Elizabeth Bresnahan and Kathryn Ignash, advise beauty companies on how to navigate the legal risks associated with consumers ‘off-label’ beauty hacks.

Supreme Court 1935 Ruling Limiting Executive Authority On Appointments ‘Unravels’ Today – DoJ

 
• By Malcolm Spicer

In complaint and response to motion to dismiss, Rebecca Kelly Slaughter’s and Alvaro Bedoya’s attorneys elaborate on Supreme Court ‘s 1935 decision, Humphrey’s Executor v. US. Administration attorneys, though, contend the ruling isn’t relevant to the current FTC.

Estee Lauder Faces Securities Fraud Suit After District Court Denies Motion To Dismiss

 
• By Eileen Francis

A federal judge in the Southern District of New York denied Estee Lauder’s motion to dismiss a securities fraud lawsuit filed by shareholders who said the company concealed its reliance on a gray market retail revenue stream, which ultimately caused sales and the stock price to plunge.

More from Policy & Regulation

US Tariff Exemption For Indonesian Materials Not Produced Domestically A Boon For Fragrance – FCA

 
• By Eileen Francis

The Fragrance Creators Association President & CEO Farah Ahmed commends the Trump Administration for exempting from tariffs Indonesian goods not naturally available or produced in the US, which recognizes the “essential” role of fragrance and essential oils.

EU Green Claims Directive: Commission Says It ‘Has Not Withdrawn’ From Negotiations

 
• By David Ridley

What's going on with the EU Green Claims Directive? HBW Insight speaks to the European Commission, Parliament and Council to find out why trilogue negotiations seem to have stalled.

Senate Appropriators Give US FDA More Non-User Fee Funds Than House

 
• By Sarah Karlin-Smith

FDA would receive more funding for fiscal year 2026 in the Senate appropriations bill than its House counterpart, including $10m for unannounced foreign inspections.