1. HBW Insight
  2. >>Beauty
  3. >>Policy & Regulation
  4. >>Legal

J&J Talc Verdict Clears Firm Of Cancer Blame; Is Tide Turning In St. Louis?

A new defense team for J&J got the job done March 3 in the same Missouri court where juries handed down hefty verdicts against the firm last year for failing to warn about talc’s alleged carcinogenicity. This time, the defendant appears to have been successful in punching holes in plaintiff experts’ testimony.

Gavel_1200x675

After suffering heavy losses in Missouri’s 22nd Judicial Circuit last year, Johnson & Johnson attorneys may be hitting their stride in defending against allegations that talc in Johnson’s Baby Powder causes ovarian cancer when used for feminine hygiene purposes.

The firm walked away from the St. Louis court March 3 with a victory following roughly seven hours of jury...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on HBW Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required
Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber?

More from Legal

Producers Sue Oregon Over ‘Crushing’ EPR Recycling Law, Call It Unconstitutional

 
• By Eileen Francis

A national wholesalers’ trade group is suing Oregon, claiming its EPR law, which requires producers to register, report packaging data and pay fees, is unconstitutional and overly burdensome.

‘Off-Label’ Beauty Hacks: Navigating the Risks of Consumer-Driven Innovation

 
• By Rachel Raphael, Elizabeth Bresnahan and Kathryn Ignash

Guest authors Rachel Raphael, partner at Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP and associates at the firm, Elizabeth Bresnahan and Kathryn Ignash, advise beauty companies on how to navigate the legal risks associated with consumers ‘off-label’ beauty hacks.

Supreme Court 1935 Ruling Limiting Executive Authority On Appointments ‘Unravels’ Today – DoJ

 
• By Malcolm Spicer

In complaint and response to motion to dismiss, Rebecca Kelly Slaughter’s and Alvaro Bedoya’s attorneys elaborate on Supreme Court ‘s 1935 decision, Humphrey’s Executor v. US. Administration attorneys, though, contend the ruling isn’t relevant to the current FTC.

Estee Lauder Faces Securities Fraud Suit After District Court Denies Motion To Dismiss

 
• By Eileen Francis

A federal judge in the Southern District of New York denied Estee Lauder’s motion to dismiss a securities fraud lawsuit filed by shareholders who said the company concealed its reliance on a gray market retail revenue stream, which ultimately caused sales and the stock price to plunge.

More from Policy & Regulation

PCPC: US Sunscreen Regs, State Recycling Laws A Burden For Trade

 
• By Lauren Nardella

The Personal Care Products Council identifies sunscreen regulations among federal laws that place US industry at a competitive disadvantage, in comments to the Federal Trade Commission and the US Department of Justice Antitrust Division.

Producers Sue Oregon Over ‘Crushing’ EPR Recycling Law, Call It Unconstitutional

 
• By Eileen Francis

A national wholesalers’ trade group is suing Oregon, claiming its EPR law, which requires producers to register, report packaging data and pay fees, is unconstitutional and overly burdensome.

Senate HELP Committee Adds Sunscreen Regulation Overhaul To OMUFA Reauthorization

 
• By Lauren Nardella

OMUFA reauthorization bill including amendment with sunscreen regulation provisions passed by Senate committee, which also approved other provisions not included in House OMUFA bill.