1. HBW Insight
  2. >>Beauty
  3. >>Policy & Regulation
  4. >>Legal

J&J Talc Verdict Clears Firm Of Cancer Blame; Is Tide Turning In St. Louis?

A new defense team for J&J got the job done March 3 in the same Missouri court where juries handed down hefty verdicts against the firm last year for failing to warn about talc’s alleged carcinogenicity. This time, the defendant appears to have been successful in punching holes in plaintiff experts’ testimony.

Gavel_1200x675

After suffering heavy losses in Missouri’s 22nd Judicial Circuit last year, Johnson & Johnson attorneys may be hitting their stride in defending against allegations that talc in Johnson’s Baby Powder causes ovarian cancer when used for feminine hygiene purposes.

The firm walked away from the St. Louis court March 3 with a victory following roughly seven hours of jury...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on HBW Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required
Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber?

More from Legal

Producers Sue Oregon Over ‘Crushing’ EPR Recycling Law, Call It Unconstitutional

 
• By Eileen Francis

A national wholesalers’ trade group is suing Oregon, claiming its EPR law, which requires producers to register, report packaging data and pay fees, is unconstitutional and overly burdensome.

‘Off-Label’ Beauty Hacks: Navigating the Risks of Consumer-Driven Innovation

 
• By Rachel Raphael, Elizabeth Bresnahan and Kathryn Ignash

Guest authors Rachel Raphael, partner at Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP and associates at the firm, Elizabeth Bresnahan and Kathryn Ignash, advise beauty companies on how to navigate the legal risks associated with consumers ‘off-label’ beauty hacks.

Supreme Court 1935 Ruling Limiting Executive Authority On Appointments ‘Unravels’ Today – DoJ

 
• By Malcolm Spicer

In complaint and response to motion to dismiss, Rebecca Kelly Slaughter’s and Alvaro Bedoya’s attorneys elaborate on Supreme Court ‘s 1935 decision, Humphrey’s Executor v. US. Administration attorneys, though, contend the ruling isn’t relevant to the current FTC.

Estee Lauder Faces Securities Fraud Suit After District Court Denies Motion To Dismiss

 
• By Eileen Francis

A federal judge in the Southern District of New York denied Estee Lauder’s motion to dismiss a securities fraud lawsuit filed by shareholders who said the company concealed its reliance on a gray market retail revenue stream, which ultimately caused sales and the stock price to plunge.

More from Policy & Regulation

Unanimous Support Across House Energy And Commerce To Reauthorize FDA’s OMUFA Program

 
• By Malcolm Spicer

Committee voted 51-0 to approve five-year authorization of FDA program user fee program needed to support regulatory pathway for large majority of nonprescription drugs available in the US with amendment to expand stakeholder engagement with FDA.

US Tariff Exemption For Indonesian Materials Not Produced Domestically A Boon For Fragrance – FCA

 
• By Eileen Francis

The Fragrance Creators Association President & CEO Farah Ahmed commends the Trump Administration for exempting from tariffs Indonesian goods not naturally available or produced in the US, which recognizes the “essential” role of fragrance and essential oils.

EU Green Claims Directive: Commission Says It ‘Has Not Withdrawn’ From Negotiations

 
• By David Ridley

What's going on with the EU Green Claims Directive? HBW Insight speaks to the European Commission, Parliament and Council to find out why trilogue negotiations seem to have stalled.