Rodan + Fields Concealed Prostaglandin Risks From Lash Boost Users – Class Action

Marketers of cosmetic lash enhancers that haven’t abandoned prostaglandin analogs in favor of peptides or botanical extracts should take heed of a proposed class action against Rodan + Fields in California’s Northern District. Plaintiffs say they would not have purchased the firm’s Lash Boost and suffered alleged adverse effects if they’d been properly informed about product risks.

Female eye with long eyelashes close up. Closeup shot of female gray - blue colour eye with day makeup. Beauty female eye with curl long eyelashes

A putative class action targeting Rodan + Fields, LLC in California federal court could draw fresh attention to the use of prostaglandin analogs in cosmetic eyelash enhancers, an issue that has sparked FDA enforcement action in the past, as well as unfair competition suits from Latisse owner Allergan plc.

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on HBW Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Legal

Uncertainty Abounds With SEC Climate Reporting Rule Tied Up In Courts

 
• By 

Despite questions surrounding the SEC rule, including disputes being litigated in the US Eighth Circuit, companies must prepare to meet the new climate disclosure requirements in addition to related mandates in California and abroad. Experts emphasize opportunities beyond compliance.

In Emergency Rule, California Bans All THCs In Hemp Products: Industry Asks, Where’s The Fire?

 

California authorities say predominance of retailers licensed to sell hemp are compliant with ban published effective on 3 October through emergency regulation. But hemp industry’s contesting the regulation in state court, arguing state authorities inappropriately used emergency action to change state law on hemp products legislature passed in 2021.

J&J Sued For ‘Plant-Based’ Claims On Aveeno, Neutrogena Makeup Removing Wipes

 
• By 

Plaintiffs in California federal courts seek restitution, damages, and other relief on behalf of themselves and consumers nationwide, whom allegedly were deceived by “Plant-Based” representations on Aveeno and Neutrogena Makeup Removing Wipes.

US FDA Action On Benzene Levels In Acne Products Demanded By New Citizen Petition

 
• By 

Filed on 20 August by Pensacola, FL-based law firm Aylstock, Witkin, Kreis & Overholtz (AWKO) on behalf of an unnamed client, the petition points to benzene study data unconnected to Valisure on unheated benzoyl peroxide products, but is light on details of how it was conducted.

More from Policy & Regulation

Cosmetics Europe Argues Against Potential Ban Of Common Fragrance, Cosmetic Ingredient Ethanol

 

Cosmetics Europe is working to obtain derogations for three fragrance and/or cosmetic substances that may be categorized as carcinogenic, mutagenic or reprotoxic, which could result in a ban of their use under the Cosmetic Products Regulation.

EU Parliament Agrees To Postpone Due Diligence And Sustainability Reporting Rules

 
• By 

Speaking at a recent AESGP webinar, sustainability expert Onur Durmus called the the European Commission’s “Omnibus” proposals - designed to simplify ESG reporting rules and recently supported by EU Parliament - a “positive development” for the European consumer health industry.

EU Wastewater Treatment Rule Draws ‘Unprecedented’ Cosmetics Industry Legal Challenge

 
• By 

The cosmetics industry in Europe, along with pharmaceuticals, has been directed to financially cover updates to European Union wastewater plants as part of an extended producer liability approach.