1. HBW Insight
  2. >>Beauty
  3. >>Policy & Regulation
  4. >>Legal

Lume Deodorant’s 72-Hour Protection Claim Challenged In New York Federal Court

 
• By Ryan Nelson

According to the plaintiff’s class action complaint, Lume’s 72-hour odor control claim is false and misleading because the study relied on by the company only evaluated Lume versus competing deodorants and concluded that it outperformed them, not that it controlled odor for up to three days.

• Source: Shutterstock

Lume Deodorant, LLC misleads consumers with claims about 72-hour odor protection, according to plaintiff Melissa Nelson’s class action complaint in New York’s Eastern District.

According to the plaintiff, she began purchasing Lume deodorant from Target locations in New York and online in June 2022, paying at least twice as much for the product compared with competing

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on HBW Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required
Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber?

More from Legal

Supreme Court 1935 Ruling Limiting Executive Authority On Appointments ‘Unravels’ Today – DoJ

 
• By Malcolm Spicer

In complaint and response to motion to dismiss, Rebecca Kelly Slaughter’s and Alvaro Bedoya’s attorneys elaborate on Supreme Court ‘s 1935 decision, Humphrey’s Executor v. US. Administration attorneys, though, contend the ruling isn’t relevant to the current FTC.

Estee Lauder Faces Securities Fraud Suit After District Court Denies Motion To Dismiss

 
• By Eileen Francis

A federal judge in the Southern District of New York denied Estee Lauder’s motion to dismiss a securities fraud lawsuit filed by shareholders who said the company concealed its reliance on a gray market retail revenue stream, which ultimately caused sales and the stock price to plunge.

Uncertainty Abounds With SEC Climate Reporting Rule Tied Up In Courts

 
• By Lauren Nardella

Despite questions surrounding the SEC rule, including disputes being litigated in the US Eighth Circuit, companies must prepare to meet the new climate disclosure requirements in addition to related mandates in California and abroad. Experts emphasize opportunities beyond compliance.

In Emergency Rule, California Bans All THCs In Hemp Products: Industry Asks, Where’s The Fire?

 
• By Malcolm Spicer

California authorities say predominance of retailers licensed to sell hemp are compliant with ban published effective on 3 October through emergency regulation. But hemp industry’s contesting the regulation in state court, arguing state authorities inappropriately used emergency action to change state law on hemp products legislature passed in 2021.

More from Policy & Regulation

Stakeholders Hope US FDA’s Proposed Animal Test Phase-Out For Drugs Will Extend To OTCs, Cosmetics

 
• By Eileen Francis and Lauren Nardella

The US Food and Drug Administration has released a roadmap to adopt new approach methodologies in lieu of animal testing for monoclonal antibody therapies and other drugs, which may include OTC drugs though the proposal does not specifically include cosmetics.

Little Industry Opposition To FDA Plan To Remove Synthetic Dyes, Or Agreement They’re Unsafe

 
• By Malcolm Spicer

Dyes and colors which FDA says industries agree should no longer be used aren’t unsafe and are currently used only with the agency’s approval, industry stakeholders say. Center for Science in the Public Interest says the dyes are used “in tens of thousands of foods and beverages that are commonly consumed here in the United States.”

US FDA Finds Banned Cosmetic Ingredient Methylene Chloride In Gel Polish Removers

 
• By Lauren Nardella

Testing conducted by the US Food and Drug Administration has found several cosmetic products on the market that contain high levels of methylene chloride, a banned ingredient.