GSK Agreed To Settle California Zantac Litigation After Judge Cleared Plaintiff's Experts To Testify

 
• By Malcolm Spicer

State court judge would've allowed testimony from 13 of 14 witnesses plaintiff proposed as experts for trial scheduled to start in late July. Plaintiff’s attorneys said decision on experts “signals significant litigation on the horizon for GSK.”

• Source: Shutterstock

A judge's decision to allow 13 plaintiff's witnesses to testify as experts may have swayed GSK plc to announce a settlement in litigation in California state court alleging the firm’s ranitidine-containing Zantac caused the plainitff's bladder cancer and the firm failed to warn of the cancer risk.

The UK pharma, which doesn’t market Zantac OTC in the US but developed and previously manufactured and marketed the heartburn...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on HBW Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required
Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber?

More from Legal

Xlear Lawsuit Argues To Shelve FTC Policy For Health Claim Substantiation Under Loper Bright

 
• By Malcolm Spicer

Complaint filed Utah federal court says “Supreme Court explicitly rejected Chevron deference to agency interpretations” in the Loper decision, compelling rejection of “an agency’s statutory interpretation unless the court, ‘after applying all relevant interpretive tools, concludes’ the interpretatio

Loper Bright ‘Might Not Be Cataclysmic’ With FDA’s ‘Good Reputation’ For Science – Attorney

 
• By Malcolm Spicer

Bridget Dooling, law school professor who reviewed draft regulations from FDA and other agencies as OMB attorney, says history of federal court decisions in litigation challenging FDA’s interpretation of statutes points to judges typically defer to agency decisions based in science.

Supreme Court 1935 Ruling Limiting Executive Authority On Appointments ‘Unravels’ Today – DoJ

 
• By Malcolm Spicer

In complaint and response to motion to dismiss, Rebecca Kelly Slaughter’s and Alvaro Bedoya’s attorneys elaborate on Supreme Court ‘s 1935 decision, Humphrey’s Executor v. US. Administration attorneys, though, contend the ruling isn’t relevant to the current FTC.

Congress, Researchers Highlight Security Risks At DNA Testing Services

 
• By Elizabeth Orr

Congress launched an inquiry into 23andMe amid privacy concerns following its bankruptcy, particularly regarding the potential sale of sensitive user data. Additionally, a Cybernews report gave 40 DNA testing firms an average cybersecurity grade of D, citing widespread vulnerabilities and data breaches, along with inadequate public information about their security practices.

More from Policy & Regulation

FDA Takes World Tour In Recent OTC Warnings

 
• By Malcolm Spicer

FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Office of Manufacturing Quality, Office of Compliance and Office of Unapproved Drugs & Labeling Compliance recently advise Indian, Canadian and US firms about GMP problems.

German Associations Call For EU Green Claims Directive Trilogue Suspension

 
• By David Ridley

Pharma Deutschland is one of 21 German associations calling for trilogue negotiations in relation to the EU Green Claims Directive to be suspended while a “comprehensive and independent written impact assessment” is undertaken.

Over The Counter: EU Omnibus And ESG, What You Need To Know, With CEN Group’s Jasper Crone

 
• By David Ridley

HBW Insight catches up with sustainability expert Jasper Crone to find out what consumer health companies need to know about the European Commission's Omnibus simplification package.