1. HBW Insight
  2. >>Beauty
  3. >>Policy & Regulation

CIR Panel Finds Two Hair Dye Ingredients Safe, But Not For Skin, Eyes Or Lashes

 
• By Lauren Nardella

Data from the US Food and Drug Administration indicated that two hair dye ingredients are formulated in eye makeup and dermal application products, prompting a Cosmetic Ingredient Review panel to conclude one dye is unsafe for such uses and discouraging those uses in the other dye.

(Shutter)

The Expert Panel for Cosmetic Ingredient Safety issued final safety assessments for two hair dye ingredients at its March meeting, emphasizing that while the substances are safe for use on hair, they are not meant to be used in dermal, eyebrow and/or eyelash applications due to concerns over adverse or allergic reactions.

Registration and listing data (RLD) from the US Food and Drug Administration alerted the Cosmetic Ingredient Review panel to uses beyond hair dye for ingredients 2,4-diaminophenoxyethanols and p-phenylenediamine, demonstrating the...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on HBW Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required
Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber?

More from Policy & Regulation

US FDA Expert Panel Paints Bleak Picture For Future Of Talc In Cosmetics

 
• By Eileen Francis

The US FDA’s 20 May expert panel on talc discussed science behind the potential carcinogenicity of the cosmetic, food and drug ingredient, the importance of ‘good science’ in evaluating the substance and the need to find alternatives in each industry.

Beauty Industry Not Taking Advantage Of CBP’s Duty Drawback – IBA Conference

 
• By Eileen Francis

US Customs and Border Protection’s program allowing companies to recoup fees for imported goods that were destroyed or exported is applicable in the case of most of President Trump’s reciprocal tariffs. However, most cosmetic companies don’t make use of it.

Beauty Firms Confused By State EPR Laws Have New Resource: EPR Academy

 
• By Eileen Francis

Beauty and personal care companies are struggling with compliance with state Extended Producer Responsibility laws, given the outstanding number of stakeholders that have still not registered products with Oregon’s EPR law, the first to go into effect.

Supreme Court 1935 Ruling Limiting Executive Authority On Appointments ‘Unravels’ Today – DoJ

 
• By Malcolm Spicer

In complaint and response to motion to dismiss, Rebecca Kelly Slaughter’s and Alvaro Bedoya’s attorneys elaborate on Supreme Court ‘s 1935 decision, Humphrey’s Executor v. US. Administration attorneys, though, contend the ruling isn’t relevant to the current FTC.

More from HBW Insight

Self-Care Must Be Central To NHS Reform, Says UK Industry And Pharmacy Alliance

 
• By David Ridley

Ahead of a soon to be released 10-Year Health Plan for the English NHS, an alliance including PAGB calls for self-care to be “clearly recognised and supported through concrete policies that reflect its vital role in achieving the plan’s goals.”

OTC Marketing Awards 2025 Open For Entries

 
• By Tom Gallen

Find out how to enter the OTC Marketing Awards before the 1 September entry deadline.

Haleon Study: Boosting Health Literacy Could Save Major Economies Over $300bn Per Year

 
• By David Ridley

By addressing disparities in health literacy, particularly in the areas of oral care, bone health, nutrition and air pollution, the consumer health industry can “save lives and billions in healthcare costs, boosting productivity and increasing GDP,” says a new report from Haleon and Economist Impact.