Reintroduced Humane Cosmetics Act Mum On FDA’s Role

While the previous session’s iteration of the Humane Cosmetics Act attracted support from nearly 40% of the House, it did not advance – a fate sponsors hope to avoid with broad bipartisan support and assurances that the bill would not hurt businesses.

The reintroduced Humane Cosmetics Act may again face an uphill battle, despite support from both sides of the aisle, given competing administration priorities and continuing uncertainties on substantiating product safety without FDA’s acceptance of certain alternative tests.

The bill will likely not be a priority following President Trump’s vow to cut regulations, though industry is hoping the...

More from Legislation

More from Policy & Regulation

House Appropriators’ $3.2Bn For FDA In FY 2026 Includes More Non-User Fee Funds Than Requested

 

A US House bill would give the FDA $33.1m more in budget authority than requested by the Trump Administration for fiscal year 2026. The measure was sent to the full House Appropriations committee on a party-line vote.

IBA Interactive Policy Map Is Call To Action As Cosmetics Industry Braces For Myriad Of State Bills

 

The Independent Beauty Association has launched an interactive Policy Map tracking state and federal bills and filtering by state or topic, pinpointing bills of great priority.

Animal Studies Would Not Provide ‘Meaningful Insights’ Into UV Filter Safety - Study

 
• By 

A new study on the safety of sunscreen filters relies on an alternative assessment methodology and concludes that six sunscreen UV filters are unlikely to be carcinogenic.