1. HBW Insight
  2. >>Wellness
  3. >>Policy & Regulation
  4. >>Regulation

Regulatory Problems Mount For Supplement Firm Following Recall

 
• By Malcolm Spicer

in addition to distributing supplements containing ED ingredients, MS Bionic was in violation of an extensive list of supplement GMP regulations. Meanwhile Absonutrix makes claims for its herbals and botanicals including "aids in the inhibition of colon cancer cell growth and survival."

Vintage inscription made by old typewriter, warning

MS Bionic Inc.'s recall in 2016 after FDA found erectile dysfunction drugs in products the California firm marketed as dietary supplements was just the tip of its problems, according to the agency's latest warning letters submitted to supplement firms.

The letters FDA posted Aug. 1 also include the Office of Regulatory Affairs' warning to Absonutrix LLC about making drug...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on HBW Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required
Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber?

More from Regulation

US FDA Clarifies Success For An NDI Notification Fits Only The Notifier’s Ingredient

Along with two instructional videos, FDA provides fact sheet detailing common problems with NDINs while supplement industry awaits guidance on two hurdles for clearing the NDIN process, providing identity information and evidence of safety for ingredients.

AESGP Annual Meeting: Harmonizing EU VMS Max Levels Could Cost Sector Over €200m

 
• By David Ridley

Limited capacity and a two-to-three year timescale for reformulation could mean that many VMS supplements disappear from the market, warns EPPA partner Alexandra Bocquillion, speaking at the AESGP Annual Meeting in Warsaw, Poland.

FDA’s FY 2026 Budget Request Lacks New Policy Proposals

 
• By Sue Sutter

The White House requested $6.8bn for the FDA, down 3.9% from the current funding level, but does not propose any legislative changes. In previous years, the agency used the budget process to seek statutory fixes specific to generic drugs and shortages.

CHPA Navigates Trump Administration’s ‘Mixed Messages,’ Ready To Traverse DSHEA Changes

 
• By Malcolm Spicer

Some changes the administration has proposed are a “great example of regulating by press release,” says Duffy MacKay, CHPA’s dietary supplements chief. But “after 30 years, the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act could be modernized to serve the consumer better.”

More from Policy & Regulation

House Appropriators’ $3.2Bn For FDA In FY 2026 Includes More Non-User Fee Funds Than Requested

 
• By Sue Sutter and Derrick Gingery

A US House bill would give the FDA $33.1m more in budget authority than requested by the Trump Administration for fiscal year 2026. The measure was sent to the full House Appropriations committee on a party-line vote.

CHPA Survey Shows Consumer Trust In Supplements Strong, Not So Much In Regulation

 
• By Malcolm Spicer

Results of survey found a majority of representative sample of US voters nationwide agree “current regulations should be updated and strengthened to protect consumers,” CHPA says.

Clarity Requested For Kennedy’s MAHA ‘Chaos’

 
• By Malcolm Spicer

Discussion of the administration’s “Make America Healthy Again” campaign at a recent regulatory conference provided a platform for questions about what HHS Secretary Kennedy wants and how he expects to get there.