Prevagen Study Data Withstand False Ad Complaint By FTC, New York AG

A federal judge dismissed a complaint filed by FTC and New York AG Schneiderman against Quincy Biosciences about claims for Prevagen cognitive supplement. The complaint did not show the company violated the FTC Act because it pointed only to possible errors in a supporting study.

The Federal Trade Commission and New York attorney general's argument that Quincy Biosciences LLC used weak data to support cognitive benefit claims for its Prevagen supplement was not strong enough to sway a federal judge against dismissing their complaint.

In a Sept. 28 order granting Quincy’s request to dismiss the complaint in the US District Court for Southern District of New York, Judge Louis Stanton said in order to allege a violation of the FTC Act, the commission must demonstrate a claim is likely to mislead consumers acting reasonably under the circumstances

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on HBW Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Legal

NAD Asks FTC To Pull Bandage Off Firm’s Plan To Exhaust Inventory Using ‘2X Faster Healing’ Claim

 

After National Advertising Division attorneys, in a review prompted by a challenge by Band-Aid line marketer Kenvue, recommended ASO LLV cease use of its “up to 2x faster healing” claim, they determined the firm had not fully complied.

Supreme Court 1935 Ruling Limiting Executive Authority On Appointments ‘Unravels’ Today – DoJ

 

In complaint and response to motion to dismiss, Rebecca Kelly Slaughter’s and Alvaro Bedoya’s attorneys elaborate on Supreme Court ‘s 1935 decision, Humphrey’s Executor v. US. Administration attorneys, though, contend the ruling isn’t relevant to the current FTC.

Loper Bright Could Trip FDA On Self-Affirmed GRAS

 

Instead of arguing FDA’s not authorized to offer option under authority from 1958 Food Additives Amendments, potential litigation could contend the law requires agency to continue making self-GRAS without notification available.

EU Probiotics Deadlock: Ombudsman Finds ‘No Maladministration’ By The Commission

 
• By 

In response to an IPA Europe complaint, European Ombudsman Emily O’Reilly finds that the Commission’s interpretation of EU food legislation in relation to probiotics is “reasonable and in line with the main goal of this legislation, which is to ensure a high level of consumer protection.”

More from Policy & Regulation