1. HBW Insight
  2. >>Beauty
  3. >>Policy & Regulation
  4. >>Legislation

Toxic Free Cosmetics Act Underscores Question: Who Should Regulate US Market, FDA Or California?

 
• By Ryan Nelson

Between the Safe Cosmetics Act, Cruelty Free Cosmetics Act, Safer Consumer Products, Prop 65 and now the proposed Toxic Free Cosmetics Act, California seems increasingly intent on setting the bar nationwide for cosmetics safety, testing and labeling requirements. The Environmental Working Group and other NGOs are by no means opposed.

State Law_484086778 _1200.jpg

If there were any question remaining, the proposed Toxic Free Cosmetics Act signals willingness among NGOs and their allies in California’s legislature to have the Golden State dictating requirements for cosmetics in the US and even worldwide, FDA and international regulatory authorities be damned.

First there was the Safe Cosmetics Act of 2005, requiring companies to report their use of listed chemicals of concern to California’s Department of Public Health, which makes the information...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on HBW Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required
Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber?

More from Legislation

No Longer Voluntary, MoCRA Drives Drastic Increase In Registered Companies, Products

 
• By Lauren Nardella

Preliminary registration data released by FDA offers a first glimpse of the Modernization of Cosmetics Regulation Act’s impact on information the agency has at hand.

WA Regulators Open Rulemaking On Cosmetic Lead Limits; Provide Safe Harbor Under TFCA

 
• By Eileen Francis

The Washington State Department of Ecology publishes ‘Interim Policy on Lead in Cosmetics’ which provides safe harbor options for cosmetic products struggling with the 1ppm limit under the state’s Toxic Free Cosmetics Act, while the department gathers information under a newly opened rulemaking to ‘identify a feasible approach to regulating lead in cosmetic products.’

WA State Regulators Haven’t Softened Stance On Preservatives, Provided Clarity On Penalties As TFCA Effective Date Nears

 
• By Eileen Francis

The Washington Department of Ecology hasn’t backed down on its targeting of formaldehyde-releasing preservatives under the state’s Toxic-Free Cosmetics Act, as industry still awaits a draft final rule. In a recent webinar, attorney Angela Deisch of Amin Wasserman Gurnani, LLP said the department has also not provided clarity on penalties under the law, which goes into effect 1 January.

Industry Support Key To US FDA’s Prospects Under Trump – Califf

 
• By Sue Sutter

The FDA's current leader, whose term will end with Donald Trump’s second inauguration, also described three qualities the agency’s next commissioner will need to succeed, including "believing that there is such a thing as expertise."

More from Policy & Regulation

Fragrance Industry Unification Hedges Against Tariff Impact – Experts

 
• By Eileen Francis

Fragrance companies and suppliers can draft contracts that ensure the cost burden of tariffs is shared, says attorney David Morrell of law firm Jones Day, during a recent panel discussion, ‘Tariffs in Motion: Insight for the Fragrance Industry.”

US Fragrance Firms Should Identify Domestic, Non-Tariff Sources Now – Fragrance House CEO

Firms in the US facing tariff costs should identify US-based, non-tariff sources and lobby local government officials and DC when foreign-sourced ingredients cannot be substituted in the US.

Cosmetics Consortium Shares Studies With FDA To Build Confidence In Animal Testing Alternatives

 
• By Lauren Nardella

By guiding regulators through case studies and mock dossier examples of how to utilize new approach methodologies, the International Collaboration on Cosmetics Safety hopes to counter hesitations in replacing animal tests.