House Bill Restoring FTC Monetary Relief Tool Stretches ‘Look Back’ Authority From 3 To 10 Years

House Passes Bill Prompted By Supreme Court Striking FTC’s Previous Reading Of Sec. 13(b)

Limiting FTC authority to enforcement started after legislation passes rather than all pending complaints as House bill allows could be divisive. But consumer health marketers question number of years before a complaint is filed agency can allege a business used false and misleading advertising under legislation the House passed.

House legislation allowing the Federal Trade Commission to impose monetary relief orders against marketers linked to false advertising goes to the Senate, where a similar bill filed in 2020 would have allowed a more limited application of the authority.

While limiting the FTC’s authority to enforcement started on or after legislation is passed rather than all complaints pending at...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on HBW Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Compliance

Germany Leading Enforcement Against Unsafe Supplements Sold In EU

 
• By 

Germany was more active than any other EU member in the second quarter in submitting notifications to the Commission regarding problematic food supplements.

Third-Party ‘Testing, Inspection and Certification’ Cleaning Up Amazon Supplement Market

 

Three FDA warnings related to supplement manufacturing, labeling or marketing submitted to Amazon or companies selling vitamin, mineral or supplement products on its e-commerce platform since April 2024.

Accelerating Natural Options Among US FDA’s Steps For Removing Petroleum-Based Food Dyes

 

HHS Secretary Kennedy commends food companies for cooperating, but also says, “We have them on the run now and we are going to win this battle. And four years from now, we're going to have most of these products off the market.”

Deleting Self-Affirmed GRAS Option Could Stretch FDA’s Already Thin Food Safety Resources

 

FDA introduced the option because it didn’t have sufficient staff to handle the volume of GRAS submission reviews requested by food and other firms for ingredients. Requiring submissions for all GRAS determinations “would just be an unworkable situation for the food industry if somehow submitting notice, submitting notices for FDA review and concurrence, was required,” says food and drug attorney Federick Stearns.

More from Policy & Regulation

FDA RIF Delays Response On NPA NMN Petition

 

Due to staff reductions at FDA ordered by DOGE, but accounting for return of some employees after their dismissals were rescinded, agency missed July 31 deadline it had set for responding to the NPA’s petition and expects to respond by Sept. 30.

US FDA’s Kratom Focus Pivots To ‘Concentrated Synthetic Byproduct That Is An Opioid’

 

Explaining he was a heroin addict for 14 years more than 40 years ago “because it was so available,” Secretary Kennedy says “our agencies have been asleep in the wheel” but “now we're going to wake up and we're going to start to stop this before it starts.”

EU Green Claims Directive: Commission Says It ‘Has Not Withdrawn’ From Negotiations

 
• By 

What's going on with the EU Green Claims Directive? HBW Insight speaks to the European Commission, Parliament and Council to find out why trilogue negotiations seem to have stalled.