1. HBW Insight
  2. >>Wellness
  3. >>Policy & Regulation
  4. >>Regulation

Mandatory Product Listing: Needed For US VMS Market, Not Mandatory In User Fee Bill – CRN

 
• By Malcolm Spicer

Establishing VMS products MPL as stated within legislation to re-authorize FDA user fee programs for drugs, biologics and medical device applications isn’t urgent enough to prevent passing user fee bill, says CRN chief Steve Mister.

Shutterstock

Mandatory product listing for dietary supplements is needed to improve US regulators’ oversight of the industry, says the Council for Responsible Nutrition.

However, imposing an MPL requirement for vitamin, mineral and supplement products as stated in provisions within legislation to re-authorize the...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on HBW Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required
Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber?

More from Regulation

EU Industry Wants EFSA Changes To Support Innovation

 
• By Tom Gallen

Prominent trade groups call on the European Commission to improve risk assessment of innovative food products by making changes to processes at the European Food Safety Authority.

US FDA Clarifies Success For An NDI Notification Fits Only The Notifier’s Ingredient

Along with two instructional videos, FDA provides fact sheet detailing common problems with NDINs while supplement industry awaits guidance on two hurdles for clearing the NDIN process, providing identity information and evidence of safety for ingredients.

AESGP Annual Meeting: Harmonizing EU VMS Max Levels Could Cost Sector Over €200m

 
• By David Ridley

Limited capacity and a two-to-three year timescale for reformulation could mean that many VMS supplements disappear from the market, warns EPPA partner Alexandra Bocquillion, speaking at the AESGP Annual Meeting in Warsaw, Poland.

FDA’s FY 2026 Budget Request Lacks New Policy Proposals

 
• By Sue Sutter

The White House requested $6.8bn for the FDA, down 3.9% from the current funding level, but does not propose any legislative changes. In previous years, the agency used the budget process to seek statutory fixes specific to generic drugs and shortages.

More from Policy & Regulation

FDA’s FY 2026 Budget Request Lacks New Policy Proposals

 
• By Sue Sutter

The White House requested $6.8bn for the FDA, down 3.9% from the current funding level, but does not propose any legislative changes. In previous years, the agency used the budget process to seek statutory fixes specific to generic drugs and shortages.

House Appropriators’ $3.2Bn For FDA In FY 2026 Includes More Non-User Fee Funds Than Requested

 
• By Sue Sutter and Derrick Gingery

A US House bill would give the FDA $33.1m more in budget authority than requested by the Trump Administration for fiscal year 2026. The measure was sent to the full House Appropriations committee on a party-line vote.

CHPA Survey Shows Consumer Trust In Supplements Strong, Not So Much In Regulation

 
• By Malcolm Spicer

Results of survey found a majority of representative sample of US voters nationwide agree “current regulations should be updated and strengthened to protect consumers,” CHPA says.