1. HBW Insight
  2. >>Beauty
  3. >>Policy & Regulation
  4. >>Legal

‘Clean At Sephora’ Suit Fails Reasonable Consumer Test; Case Dismissed

Plaintiff Lindsay Finster may file an amended complaint by 29 March

 
• By Eileen Francis

Sephora successfully dismissed a putative class action in New York’s Northern District on 15 March, as the judge was not convinced by the plaintiff that a reasonable consumer would read “Clean at Sephora” as meaning “no synthetic or harmful ingredients whatsoever.”

Sephora
Shutterstock

“Clean beauty” stakeholders will be reassured by a New York federal court’s dismissal on 15 March of a consumer class action complaint targeting the retailer’s “Clean at Sephora” claims.

“Making all reasonable inferences in [plaintiff’s] favor she has not plausibly alleged that Sephora materially mislead consumers when it marketed...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on HBW Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required
Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber?

More from Legal

Producers Sue Oregon Over ‘Crushing’ EPR Recycling Law, Call It Unconstitutional

 
• By Eileen Francis

A national wholesalers’ trade group is suing Oregon, claiming its EPR law, which requires producers to register, report packaging data and pay fees, is unconstitutional and overly burdensome.

‘Off-Label’ Beauty Hacks: Navigating the Risks of Consumer-Driven Innovation

 
• By Rachel Raphael, Elizabeth Bresnahan and Kathryn Ignash

Guest authors Rachel Raphael, partner at Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP and associates at the firm, Elizabeth Bresnahan and Kathryn Ignash, advise beauty companies on how to navigate the legal risks associated with consumers ‘off-label’ beauty hacks.

Supreme Court 1935 Ruling Limiting Executive Authority On Appointments ‘Unravels’ Today – DoJ

 
• By Malcolm Spicer

In complaint and response to motion to dismiss, Rebecca Kelly Slaughter’s and Alvaro Bedoya’s attorneys elaborate on Supreme Court ‘s 1935 decision, Humphrey’s Executor v. US. Administration attorneys, though, contend the ruling isn’t relevant to the current FTC.

Estee Lauder Faces Securities Fraud Suit After District Court Denies Motion To Dismiss

 
• By Eileen Francis

A federal judge in the Southern District of New York denied Estee Lauder’s motion to dismiss a securities fraud lawsuit filed by shareholders who said the company concealed its reliance on a gray market retail revenue stream, which ultimately caused sales and the stock price to plunge.

More from Policy & Regulation

Producers Sue Oregon Over ‘Crushing’ EPR Recycling Law, Call It Unconstitutional

 
• By Eileen Francis

A national wholesalers’ trade group is suing Oregon, claiming its EPR law, which requires producers to register, report packaging data and pay fees, is unconstitutional and overly burdensome.

Senate HELP Committee Adds Sunscreen Regulation Overhaul To OMUFA Reauthorization

 
• By Lauren Nardella

OMUFA reauthorization bill including amendment with sunscreen regulation provisions passed by Senate committee, which also approved other provisions not included in House OMUFA bill.

Sunscreen Regulation Reforms Still Could Hitch Ride On Senate OMUFA Reauthorization Bill

As stakeholders and lawmakers pin their hopes on OMUFA reauthorization as a vehicle for enacting sunscreen regulatory changes, Senate version of the bill could be the ticket after a sunscreen-specific amendment withdrawn in the House.