1. HBW Insight
  2. >>Beauty
  3. >>Policy & Regulation
  4. >>Legislation

‘It's Not Sustainable For Companies To Reformulate For One State’ – PCPC’s Karin Ross

 
• By Lauren Nardella

Legislator education is key to checking state bills that overreach, says Ross, executive VP of government affairs at the Personal Care Products Council, discussing the rising tide of US state bills aimed at restricting ingredient use.

• Source: Shutterstock

The Modernization of Cosmetics Regulation Act overhauled how cosmetics are regulated at the federal level but left the door open for states to impose their own restrictions on ingredients, and state legislators are using that opening to push bills that go beyond the prohibitions laid out in MOCRA.

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on HBW Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required
Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber?

More from Legislation

No Longer Voluntary, MoCRA Drives Drastic Increase In Registered Companies, Products

 
• By Lauren Nardella

Preliminary registration data released by FDA offers a first glimpse of the Modernization of Cosmetics Regulation Act’s impact on information the agency has at hand.

WA Regulators Open Rulemaking On Cosmetic Lead Limits; Provide Safe Harbor Under TFCA

 
• By Eileen Francis

The Washington State Department of Ecology publishes ‘Interim Policy on Lead in Cosmetics’ which provides safe harbor options for cosmetic products struggling with the 1ppm limit under the state’s Toxic Free Cosmetics Act, while the department gathers information under a newly opened rulemaking to ‘identify a feasible approach to regulating lead in cosmetic products.’

WA State Regulators Haven’t Softened Stance On Preservatives, Provided Clarity On Penalties As TFCA Effective Date Nears

 
• By Eileen Francis

The Washington Department of Ecology hasn’t backed down on its targeting of formaldehyde-releasing preservatives under the state’s Toxic-Free Cosmetics Act, as industry still awaits a draft final rule. In a recent webinar, attorney Angela Deisch of Amin Wasserman Gurnani, LLP said the department has also not provided clarity on penalties under the law, which goes into effect 1 January.

Industry Support Key To US FDA’s Prospects Under Trump – Califf

 
• By Sue Sutter

The FDA's current leader, whose term will end with Donald Trump’s second inauguration, also described three qualities the agency’s next commissioner will need to succeed, including "believing that there is such a thing as expertise."

More from Policy & Regulation

Oregon EPR Reporting Deadline Passes, But Non-Compliant Firms Have One More Shot

 
• By Eileen Francis

Single-use packaging producers subject to Oregon state’s Extended Producer Responsibility law that didn’t meet the 31 March deadline to report their packaging materials are given a grace period to report until 30 April, says Circular Action Alliance, the organization carrying out the EPR program.

German Industry Urges ECHA To Reconsider ‘De Facto’ EU Ethanol Ban

 
• By David Ridley

Reclassifying ethanol as a carcinogenic, mutagenic, or reprotoxic substance - something the European Chemicals Agency seems likely to do in the near future - would be “tantamount to a de facto ban” with “fatal consequences” for medical care in Germany, says Pharma Deutschland in a joint paper with 13 other German healthcare industry associations.

CA Prop 65: Personal Care Firms Wrestle With Listing Of Common Stabilizer, Packaging Material

 
• By Eileen Francis

Personal care companies selling in California that suspect they are subject to its listing of a common stabilizer and packaging material should collect Certificates of Analysis for all raw materials, pursue third-party formula testing and retain counsel.