California’s latest proposal to limit the products eligible to use a short-form Proposition 65 warning and modify those warning statements places undue burdens and costs on companies while only confusing consumers, says consumer products and environmental regulation attorney Dennis Raglin.
Read the full article – start your free trial today!
Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on HBW Insight for daily insights
- Start your 7-day free trial
- Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
- Access comprehensive global coverage
- Enjoy instant access – no credit card required
Already a subscriber?