California’s Prop 65 Short-Form Warning Changes Are Costly, Confusing And Quick – Lawyer

California’s proposal to amend ‘Clear and Reasonable’ safe harbor warnings will be costly for companies and confusing to consumers, and the one-year phase-in for changes to Prop 65 warnings is “unrealistic,” says consumer product and environmental regulation lawyer Dennis Raglin.

California’s latest proposal to limit the products eligible to use a short-form Proposition 65 warning and modify those warning statements places undue burdens and costs on companies while only confusing consumers, says consumer products and environmental regulation attorney Dennis Raglin.

“It’s a surgical precision it seems to me by this agency in afflicting regulation that burdens businesses and that ends...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on HBW Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Regulation

New US FDA Chief Counsel More Familiar With Trump World Than Food and Drug Law

 

Sean Keveney is largely unknown in the FDA law space, but likely is familiar and connected to the White House given his work on Trump’s antisemitism taskforce.

EFSA: ‘A Dose Of Estragole Without A Harmful Effect Cannot Be Established’

 
• By 

Dietary supplements containing estragole may have to be removed from the European Union market due to carcinogenic risk, according to a draft scientific opinion from EFSA that is currently out for consultation.

EU Green Claims Directive: Commission Says It ‘Has Not Withdrawn’ From Negotiations

 
• By 

What's going on with the EU Green Claims Directive? HBW Insight speaks to the European Commission, Parliament and Council to find out why trilogue negotiations seem to have stalled.

US FDA Extracts More Evidence To Ban Kratom

 

Recent warning letters to seven companies marketing products with kratom extract known as 7-OH are FDA’s first in three years referencing unlawful products containing kratom and the first of all its kratom-related warnings to reference extracts from the botanical.

More from Policy & Regulation

US FDA’s Kratom Focus Pivots To ‘Concentrated Synthetic Byproduct That Is An Opioid’

 

Explaining he was a heroin addict for 14 years more than 40 years ago “because it was so available,” Secretary Kennedy says “our agencies have been asleep in the wheel” but “now we're going to wake up and we're going to start to stop this before it starts.”

EU Green Claims Directive: Commission Says It ‘Has Not Withdrawn’ From Negotiations

 
• By 

What's going on with the EU Green Claims Directive? HBW Insight speaks to the European Commission, Parliament and Council to find out why trilogue negotiations seem to have stalled.

US FDA Extracts More Evidence To Ban Kratom

 

Recent warning letters to seven companies marketing products with kratom extract known as 7-OH are FDA’s first in three years referencing unlawful products containing kratom and the first of all its kratom-related warnings to reference extracts from the botanical.