Shortfall Happens

The dark side of outsourcing is coming into view: worldwide capacity for biological manufacturing is currently maxed out. Firms with biological products still in clinical development could find their progress to market delayed, if they can't make enough protein for trials. Others unable to meet demand for approved products will have to reconcile themselves to lost sales. Demand will likely exceed capacity for several years to come--putting companies that do have manufacturing capacity in strong bargaining positions.

The biotechnology industry has embraced outsourcing in recent years, seeing it as a practical way to focus investment and limit risk. Supposedly sager biotechs let go of the vision of becoming FIPCOS (fully-integrated pharmaceutical companies), deciding that money was better spent on R&D or acquisitions, than on capital intensive capacities that could be had for hire. And the fear factor also kicked in: if a product failed or fell behind, a costly manufacturing plant or purpose-built sales team would be left sitting idle, burning vital cash. Firms that outsourced were praised for their parsimony, while those that bucked the trend—like ImClone Systems Inc. , which decided to build its own manufacturing plant, were criticized for doing so.

But now the dark side of outsourcing is coming into focus. Worldwide capacity for biological manufacturing is maxed out. Firms...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on In Vivo for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Business Strategy

When VC Steps Back: Finding Alternative Biotech Funding

 
• By 

The biotech funding landscape is undergoing a fundamental shift. With traditional VC becoming increasingly cautious and selective, industry executives are exploring new avenues for capital. Conversely, this evolution may ultimately benefit the sector's long-term sustainability.

Podcast: “They Are Able To Keep Their Body”: Medipost On Its Stem Cell Therapy Vision

 

In Vivo spoke with Edward Ahn, CEO of Medipost, a Korean company that has developed stem cell therapies from cord blood, on how they are working across regulatory markets to provide a novel treatment for degenerative diseases.

Can Italy Shake Off Its Reputation And Become A Premier Hub For Biotech?

 
• By 

Leading industry experts have spoken to In Vivo about how investment, a change in mindset and a fresh approach to policy may allow Italy to kick-start its biotech ecosystem.

Rising Leaders 2025: Abbas Kazimi’s Vision For Nimbus Therapeutics

 
• By 

Rising Leader Abbas Kazimi's leadership at Nimbus Therapeutics combines immigrant resilience, patient-first partnerships, contrarian strategic bets and a deeply personal mission driving breakthrough drug discovery innovation.

More from In Vivo

Rising leaders 2025: Aneesh Karatt-Vellatt On Maxion Therapeutics’ Antibody Revolution

 
• By 

Aneesh Karatt-Vellatt is leading the charge to redefine how ion channels and G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are targeted with antibody therapies, one of the most notoriously challenging classes of drug targets.

Podcast: Scancell’s Cancer Vaccine Progress With NHS Partnership

 
• By 

In the latest podcast interview, Phil L'Huillier, CEO of Scancell, discussed the company's work in cancer vaccine development, and its selection as the first British biotech to be a part of the NHS Cancer Vaccine Launch Pad.

Geopolitical Volatility Not Dimming A Healthy Mid-Term Outlook For Life Sciences Deals

 
• By 

New report by global law firm Taylor Wessing and Bayes Business School forecasts a steadily increasing volume of major life sciences M&A in the coming five years, but highlights concerns over cybersecurity and unrealistic valuations. Taylor Wessing partner Andrew Edge spoke to In Vivo.