The Fits and Starts of Targeted Cancer Drug Development
• By Mark Ratner
Despite the success of Gleevec, developing drugs that inhibit complex signaling pathways, while simultaneously trying to understand the biology around a drug's target, remains a challenge. Without biomarkers to help establish dosing and identify likely responding patients, clinical development of targeted cancer drugs will remain challenging. AstraZeneca's recent experience with Iressa bears this out. It's likely that single markers will not be sufficient to stratify patients by their tumor types; rather, patterns of gene and protein expression will be required. The technology to take these measurements is making its way from academia to industry, but the process is slow, and needs encouragement and better coordination between academia, regulators, and industry. Meanwhile, clinical trials themselves remain the best target validation tools. When all is said and done, efficacy is the best biomarker.
By Mark L. Ratner
Novartis AG 's imatinib mesylate (Gleevec) and Genentech Inc. 's two antibody drugs rituximab (Rituxan, co-developed with Biogen...
Read the full article – start your free trial today!
Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Scrip for daily insights
The Swiss neuroscience specialist has extended its cash runway into late 2027, but will still need positive readouts in the coming months, including for its wholly owned Parkinson’s candidate.
Seizing an opportunity to buy out struggling 'zombie' biotechs, Xoma is helping to return investor cash and pick up potential bargain assets for itself. Its CEO and chief investment officer explained their approach to Scrip.
Zydus's saroglitazar beat both Gilead’s Livdelzi and Ipsen’s Iqirvo on biochemical response in topline results from a Phase IIb/III trial in primary biliary cholangitis, but subtle differences in definitions, data on pruritus or itching and other factors could be key to approval and adoption.