Stock Watch
Novo Nordisk learned from missing analysts’ estimates after its second-quarter report but Eli Lilly was caught this time round. Meanwhile, a falling tide grounded all ships after the US election.
Pfizer’s and Moderna’s quarterly pandemic-related product sales could not mask other weaknesses while GSK’s quarter was marred by unimpressive non-pandemic vaccines sales.
Investors’ different responses to third-quarter sales growth at Sanofi and Novartis left future seasonal sales trends and past business development activity under scrutiny.
Pharmaceutical company managers may view biosimilar erosion of their products’ sales in the same rose-tinted light cast by Humira’s delayed biosimilars in the US. Payers, however, may be more clear sighted.
Investors responded positively to the first third-quarter life sciences earnings report of the season although Stelara’s loss of exclusivity clouded the pitch.
New product launches come with great expectations, which are sometimes unrealistic. This can lead to disappointment. Lately, market access restrictions are exacerbating sales challenges.
As broad stock markets finished the third quarter of 2024 on a high, two large biotech companies battled on more than one front. Despite both announcing positive news in the last week of the quarter, neither seemed to be a clear winner over that period.
R&D managers can sometimes drive a drug’s development despite evidence of its unviability. This has recently resulted in a scramble to adjust in-progress trial protocol and post-approval cost-effectiveness concerns.
The biotechnology and pharmaceutical sectors outsource much of their drug discovery and clinical development efforts to contract organizations. Investors’ reduced appetite for biotech is now impacting those contractors.
As it navigates product transition in ophthalmology against biosimilar and branded rivals, Regeneron seems to have a simpler challenge in another major therapeutic area.
Historically, announcements from biotech companies have triggered stock price fluctuations as investors misinterpret the details. However, two recent instances suggest this pattern might be shifting.
As the pharma earnings season wrapped up, it seemed like a contest to see which company's stock price dropped the most after their announcement and which made the poorest acquisition.
Novo disappointed on high expectations with its second-quarter announcement resulting in stock price weakness. But after Lilly reported without disappointment, something unexpected happened.
One company’s weak quarterly sales should not make a pharmaceutical winter. But combine the lower sales of major vaccine families across three companies’ portfolios with weak demand in China and it starts to feel chilly.
Grouping products into 'growth' or 'launches' is a statement of high expectations. Reporting sales in China has had similar growth connotations, until recently.
Binary reactions continued in the second week of the earnings season as AstraZeneca and Sanofi unveiled their financials. This time, the performance of co-marketed products and differing exposures to China were possible culprits.
Both of the first two companies to report second-quarter financials maintained full-year sales guidance. But while Johnson & Johnson’s investors seemed cheered, Novartis’s may have been concerned about familiar issues.
When loss-making biotech companies mix debt with sluggish sales, difficult options like restructuring and asset sales remain.
Three new vaccines to prevent RSV infections in seniors and sales trends in pediatric vaccines highlight a shift away from childhood vaccines and a possible age-related immunity deficit.
Presenting at conferences allows companies to showcase data on new drugs and secure licensing partners, as well as further investment by shareholders. But two presentations at the recent EHA conference had the opposite effect.