1. In Vivo
  2. >>Archive

GSK's Early Link-Up with Abbott for an Immunotherapy Companion Diagnostic

GSK's first immunotherapy is still 4-5 years away, but it is already commissioning a companion diagnostic for it. By striking a deal with Abbott for a commercial screening test this early, the pharma may be laying the groundwork to address any regulatory concerns around using the test to enrich its clinical trials populations, which could allow for lower numbers of patients to be enrolled in order to prove efficacy.

Commercialization of GlaxoSmithKline PLC’s first product from its Antigen Specific Cancer Immunotherapy (ASCI) program is still at least several years off, but the company is already commissioning a companion diagnostic for it. It has enlisted Abbott Laboratories Inc.’s Abbott Molecular Inc. to develop a PCR-based test to screen non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors for expression of MAGE-A3, an antigen found on NSCLC, melanomas, and other solid tumors. [See Deal] By striking a deal for a screening test this far in advance of commercialization, GSK may be laying the groundwork to address any regulatory concerns around using an enriched clinical trial population, anticipating a data package for approval based on a rapid and probably more responsive clinical trial owing to the use of the screening test, which could allow for lower numbers of patients to be enrolled to prove efficacy.

Like most immunotherapy endeavors, ASCI is a long-term bet for GSK. The firm had been collaborating since 1995 with the...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on In Vivo for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required
Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber?

More from Archive

Final Chance To Have Your Say: Take Our Reader Survey This Week

 
• By Eleanor Malone

Editor’s note: This is your final call to participate in the survey to better understand our subscribers’ content and delivery needs. The deadline is 20 September.

Early Development Deals: Ipsen's Strategy For Biomarker-Driven Success

 
• By Eliza Slawther

Mary Jane Hinrichs, Ipsen’s head of early development, talks to In Vivo about getting ahead of the competition by securing deals for candidates before they enter Phase I trials.   

Shape Our Content: Take The Reader Survey

 
• By Eleanor Malone

Editor’s note: We are conducting a survey to better understand our subscribers’ content and delivery needs. If there are any changes you’d like to see in the coverage topics, content format or the method in which you receive and access In Vivo, or if you love it how it is, now is the time to have your voice heard.

Sponsored by:

Prioritizing Safety in CAR-T Therapy: Patient Monitoring with Cerba Research’s Testing Portfolio

The cell and gene therapy (CGT) clinical trial landscape in general and CAR-T cell clinical trials in particular are a special focus for the FDA, EMA, and other regulatory agencies. The whole industry is thus aware of the recent FDA safety investigation and requirements for labeling CAR therapy products.

More from In Vivo

‘A Small Medtech Industry Ecosystem With An Outsized Global Influence’

 
• By Ashley Yeo

Entrepreneurialism is in the blood of Israel’s medtech innovators, but in a changing medtech world, the local ecosystem must address funding gaps and manufacturing and infrastructure needs. So says Ruti Alon, experienced Israeli medtech leader, investor and co-chair of the Biomed Israel conference.

Dealmaking Quarterly Statistics, Q2 2025

 
• By Maureen Riordan and Deanna Kamienski

During Q2, biopharma merger and acquisition deal value reached $24.6bn and drew in $60.7bn in potential deal value from alliances. Device company M&A values reached $223m, while in vitro diagnostics and research tools players’ M&A activity totaled $802m.

PBMs Tighten The Reins: Value Becomes The New Access Gatekeeper

 
• By Andrew Cox

Facing rising costs and tighter regulations, PBMs and insurers are accelerating the shift to value-based drug coverage, demanding stronger proof of therapeutic and economic benefit from pharma.