House Appropriators Will Tell US FDA 'Don't Finalize' LDT Guidance In 2018 Funding Bill

When the House Appropriations Committee takes up the US FDA funding bill for 2018, report language would "prevent the agency from finalizing a guidance on regulating laboratory developed tests," Rep. Rosa DeLauro said at a June 28 Ag/FDA subcommittee markup. The House bill, while maintaining FDA discretionary funding at its prior-year $2.8bn level, also fully appropriates user fee authorizations agreed to by Senate and House Committees in FDA Reauthorization bills in May and June, respectively.

A rider "that prevents FDA from finalizing guidance on laboratory-developed tests" will appear in report language for the House's FY 2018 FDA appropriations bill, Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-Conn., said at a June 28 House Appropriations Committee, Agriculture and FDA subpanel markup. The rider follows FDA's decision in January to put off long-held plans to finalize a regulatory framework guidance for LDTs, leaving it up to Congress to figure out the best regulatory pathway for the diagnostic services.

DeLauro said she has "concerns" about the report language, which from her

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Medtech Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Legislation

‘The FDA Will Be Looking For Avenues To Regulate Laboratory Developed Tests’

 

The FDA's final LDT ruling was struck down in federal court last month. For now, diagnostic companies can commercialize under CLIA regulations or apply for FDA approval. McDermott and Tribun Health have shared insights on the risks, pros and cons of both regulatory routes.

Keep An Eye On Landmark Global Pandemic Treaty, Experts Advise

 

Mechanisms in the draft treaty that the more than 190 member states of the World Health Organization have finally agreed to are expected to “materially affect companies,” particularly those that develop, manufacture or distribute pandemic-related health care products.

New Semiconductor Tariffs Could Raise Device Costs

 
• By 

Proposed tariffs on semiconductors from President Donald Trump could significantly raise costs for the US medical device industry. Current domestic production cannot meet demand, spurring concerns about potential price increases for consumers and healthcare systems.

AdvaMed Unveils Its First ‘AI Roadmap’ To Help Lawmakers Navigate Regulating The Technology Through Rocky Times

 

Members of AdvaMed’s digital health tech board of directors discussed the organization’s efforts to aid the Trump administration and Congress in answering AI policy questions, especially as companies deal with mounting regulatory uncertainty.

More from Policy & Regulation

FDA Announces Classifications On 8 Device Types

 
• By 

The US Food and Drug Administration has announced new classifications for eight device types that reached market via the de novo process, with most of the newly classified products in the diagnostics sector.

Medical Devices Not The Focus Of FDA’s Plans To Step Up Foreign Inspections, Expert Says

 

The US FDA recently announced plans to carry out more unannounced inspections of foreign facilities. But those inspections will primarily target drug producers, with less attention and resources allocated to those making devices.

State And International Enforcement Agencies May Step Up Amid Uncertain Federal Environment

 
• By 

States and international regulatory bodies may increase their US enforcement role following federal staff cuts, Hyman Phelps & McNamara attorneys said in a recent webinar. The attorneys also expect False Claims Act enforcement and public health to remain key areas of focus at the federal level.