Despite 510(k) Software Guidance, US FDA's Hands May Still Be Tied

While a recent final guidance when a 510(k) is needed for software changes is helpful, a key industry lobbyist says it doesn't do enough to address the bigger issue of allowing FDA more discretion to let software medical device-makers update their products quickly without burdensome agency oversight.

US FDA's final guidance last month on when a new 510(k) is warranted for software changes to a medical device is progress, but it still limits the agency's ability to use regulatory discretion, says one industry lobbyist,. That issue, however, may start to be addressed with a new digital health pre-certification program the agency is testing out.

The software guidance is an outgrowth of the broader-based 510(k) modifications guidance, which updated a heavily used 1997...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Medtech Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Regulation

UK MHRA Ready To Evolve Approach To In-House Manufactured Medtech

 
• By 

The UK device regulator wants to align health institution device exemptions with its evolving policy of agile regulation of medtech in the British market. It asks stakeholders to complete a survey by Sept. 15.

FDA Panel Supports Dermal Fillers For Décolletage Use

 
• By 

An FDA panel has endorsed the use of dermal fillers for décolletage, but warned of patient safety concerns. The filler can cause complications with future imaging and pregnancy or breastfeeding, panelists said. Regulatory measures and patient studies are recommended for better outcomes.

FDA Changes Fail To Diminish US Appeal To European Medtech Industry

 

Despite staffing cuts and uncertainty at the FDA, the US still offers EU medtech firms stronger regulatory support, regulatory expert Bassil Akra told Medtech Insight. This is especially valued as EU rules are often viewed as overly stringent, unclear and difficult to follow.

Environmental Group Questions FDA’s Stance On PFAS In Medical Devices

 

The US FDA says PFAS used in medical devices are safe and that there’s no reason to restrict them in device production. An environmental group finds the agency’s assertion questionable.

More from Policy & Regulation

NAD Alerts Agendia Over Endorsing Physician’s Ties To Firm

 
• By 

The National Advertising Division (NAD) alerted Agendia to improve disclosure regarding a physician endorsing its MammaPrint test. The physician's ties to Agendia were inadequately revealed in LinkedIn posts.

FDA Ends Effort To Regulate LDTs By Rescinding Final Rule

 

Just a year and four months after publishing a final rule that would have allowed it to regulate laboratory developed tests as medical devices, the US FDA has rescinded the controversial measure, finally putting an end to the saga.

FDA Changes Fail To Diminish US Appeal To European Medtech Industry

 

Despite staffing cuts and uncertainty at the FDA, the US still offers EU medtech firms stronger regulatory support, regulatory expert Bassil Akra told Medtech Insight. This is especially valued as EU rules are often viewed as overly stringent, unclear and difficult to follow.