Assessing A Device-Maker's Manufacturing Capability Is Serious Business For These 2 Longtime CMMI Appraisers. Here’s Their Story
Medtech's Next Top Maturity Model: Part 4
• By Shawn M. Schmitt
From training classes to onsite observations, two lead appraisers affiliated with Pittsburgh's CMMI Institute describe the high hurdles they jumped to be part of a flourishing US FDA pilot program that aims to elevate product, manufacturing and process quality at device firms. The pilot uses an industry-tailored version of the tried-and-true Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) framework that's been around for decades. Beth Layman, an appraiser who has assessed more than a hundred companies in a variety of industries, says appraisers can't just be book-smart – rather, they must also possess a select set of personal skills, including flexibility and open-mindedness. Her fellow appraiser Thayne Hill, who "was there in the early days" of the Capability Maturity Model, says device-makers are often leery of appraisers because of past negative interactions with regulators, which can make his job challenging.
The fourth of a multi-part Medtech Insight feature series on the appraisal of manufacturing capability and maturity, and what it means for the medical device industry.
[Editor's note:This is the fourth of a multi-part Medtech Insight feature series on the appraisal of manufacturing capability and maturity, and what it means for the medical device industry. Check out Part 1 at https://bit.ly/2jGPlL1, Part 2 at https://bit.ly/2K6TWRV, and Part 3 at https://bit.ly/2K69U34.]
A few decades ago, as a civilian electronic engineer working in the US Air Force, Thayne Hill became part of...
Read the full article – start your free trial today!
Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Medtech Insight for daily insights
The UK device regulator wants to align health institution device exemptions with its evolving policy of agile regulation of medtech in the British market. It asks stakeholders to complete a survey by Sept. 15.
An FDA panel has endorsed the use of dermal fillers for décolletage, but warned of patient safety concerns. The filler can cause complications with future imaging and pregnancy or breastfeeding, panelists said. Regulatory measures and patient studies are recommended for better outcomes.
Despite staffing cuts and uncertainty at the FDA, the US still offers EU medtech firms stronger regulatory support, regulatory expert Bassil Akra told Medtech Insight. This is especially valued as EU rules are often viewed as overly stringent, unclear and difficult to follow.
The US FDA says PFAS used in medical devices are safe and that there’s no reason to restrict them in device production. An environmental group finds the agency’s assertion questionable.
An FDA panel has endorsed the use of dermal fillers for décolletage, but warned of patient safety concerns. The filler can cause complications with future imaging and pregnancy or breastfeeding, panelists said. Regulatory measures and patient studies are recommended for better outcomes.
The National Advertising Division (NAD) alerted Agendia to improve disclosure regarding a physician endorsing its MammaPrint test. The physician's ties to Agendia were inadequately revealed in LinkedIn posts.
Just a year and four months after publishing a final rule that would have allowed it to regulate laboratory developed tests as medical devices, the US FDA has rescinded the controversial measure, finally putting an end to the saga.
