How Should US FDA Navigate Thorny First Amendment Conundrums: Former Chief Counsels Offer Advice

Daniel Troy suggests FDA increase its investment in science of consumer understanding, while Richard Cooper recommends the "bully pulpit" approach to get industry's attention. A panel of former chief counsels stressed that the agency cannot continue to ignore First Amendment free speech issues.

Man with mouth covered by masking tape

US FDA has been in an unsettled state regarding its regulation of First Amendment free speech issues, and several former chief counsels have some tips for how the agency can better navigate the complex issue.

Speaking at an Oct. 19 panel of former FDA chief counsels at a meeting in Washington, DC, hosted by the Food and Drug Law Institute (FDLI), Daniel Troy, who served...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Medtech Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Legal & IP

Final Curtain For LDTs? FDA Will Not Appeal District Court Decision To Vacate Final Rule

 

The US FDA has given up on its effort to regulate lab-developed tests as medical devices, at least for now. The agency will not appeal a decision from the Eastern District of Texas that tossed out the FDA’s final rule, leaving the agency with few cards.

State And International Enforcement Agencies May Step Up Amid Uncertain Federal Environment

 
• By 

States and international regulatory bodies may increase their US enforcement role following federal staff cuts, Hyman Phelps & McNamara attorneys said in a recent webinar. The attorneys also expect False Claims Act enforcement and public health to remain key areas of focus at the federal level.

FDA And Boston Scientific Face Legal Action Over Spinal Device Safety

 
• By 

A patient, Dena Lawler, is suing Boston Scientific and the US FDA over alleged harm from a spinal stimulator device. Lawler claims inadequate regulatory review allowed dangerous modifications to the device, which then caused her pain and other health issues. She is calling for reconsideration of the device approvals.

California Medtech Firms Resolve Patent Dispute Over Delivery Catheters

 

Route 92 says it has reached a settlement with Q’Apel Medical over patent claims concerning its Tenzing delivery catheters.

More from Policy & Regulation

Abbott Announces FDA Approval Of Tendyne Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement System

 
• By 

Abbott received the US FDA nod for its Tendyne system, offering a minimally invasive alternative to replace the valves of patients with severe mitral valve disease who are at risk for open-heart surgery.

FDA Rebukes Four Companies, Including One Overseas, For Procedural Failures

 

The US FDA’s device center sent warning letters to three domestic device manufacturers and one German firm for failing to adhere to protocol on several issues.

EU Finalizes Framework For Joint Clinical Assessments Of High-Risk Devices

 

Second submission window for joint scientific consultations on a procedure to help prepare for joint clinical assessments will open from 2 to 30 June 2025.