Texas Court Ruling Invalidating ACA Threatens Preexisting Illness Coverage, But It's Not The Final Word, Congress Says

A Texas federal district court judge ruled late on Dec. 14 that all of the Affordable Care Act – including parts mandating coverage of preexisting conditions, the medical device excise tax and reporting by medtech firms of payments made to health-care providers under sunshine provisions – are invalid because the health-care law's individual mandate was struck down by a 2017 tax law. But Congress and legal experts say the ruling will be challenged.

Courthouse Pillars & Stairs

A closely watched court decision by a US District judge for a Texas federal court striking down the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act would have a sweeping impact on all remnants of the law, including the medical device tax, preexisting conditions coverage and mandatory reporting to the "Open Payments" database – but the ruling may not have staying power, legal experts say.

Even the Trump administration’s Department of Health and Human Services cautioned Monday that the decisionby Judge Reed O’Connor of the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas isn’t the final word

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Medtech Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Legal & IP

State And International Enforcement Agencies May Step Up Amid Uncertain Federal Environment

 
• By 

States and international regulatory bodies may increase their US enforcement role following federal staff cuts, Hyman Phelps & McNamara attorneys said in a recent webinar. The attorneys also expect False Claims Act enforcement and public health to remain key areas of focus at the federal level.

FDA And Boston Scientific Face Legal Action Over Spinal Device Safety

 
• By 

A patient, Dena Lawler, is suing Boston Scientific and the US FDA over alleged harm from a spinal stimulator device. Lawler claims inadequate regulatory review allowed dangerous modifications to the device, which then caused her pain and other health issues. She is calling for reconsideration of the device approvals.

California Medtech Firms Resolve Patent Dispute Over Delivery Catheters

 

Route 92 says it has reached a settlement with Q’Apel Medical over patent claims concerning its Tenzing delivery catheters.

US Medtech Tariffs: How Will EU Navigate Unchartered Territory?

 

US President Trump has imposed sweeping tariffs that encompass medtech. These are expected to drive up costs, disrupt supply chains and hinder innovation, likely driving the EU to seek new trade partnerships to mitigate the impact.

More from Policy & Regulation

Debate On FDA User Fee Reauthorization Begins To Take Shape

 
• By 

A battle may be forming over the 2027 FDA user fee reauthorizations. At a conference Friday, Democratic Rep. Jake Auchincloss supports them for their effectiveness, while Deputy FDA Commissioner Grace Graham echoed criticisms from HHS Sec. Kennedy, among others, in calling for reform to ensure public trust.

Health Secretary Defends Spending Cuts During Senate Hearing On HHS Budget

 
• By 

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. emphasized administrative cost reductions and defended budget decisions during a Senate hearing on HHS funding. Some senators, however, expressed concerns over the impacts spending cuts had on essential health programs.

Tariffs Threaten Medtech Innovation And US Position As World Leader, Whitaker Tells Lawmakers

 

During his testimony before US senators on the impact of tariffs on critical supply chains, AdvaMed’s Scott Whitaker said the Trump tariffs could jeopardize America’s preeminence in medtech. Other industry experts echoed similar concerns.