Commercial Model Innovation Key To Lowering China Compliance Risks

Balanced scorecards, big data, and platform strategies are among the new tools being employed by pharma companies ramping up compliance and lowering risks in China, where market access remains challenging and pricing pressures persistent. Such commercial model innovation should also improve physician interaction while providing new medical solutions, said executives at a recent RDPAC gathering in Beijing.

When top executives at Guangdong Techpool Bio-Pharma Co. Ltd. were drawing up plans for the firm’s future direction, they paid a visit to Harvard Business School Professor Robert S. Kaplan, who is known for applying “balanced scorecard” theory to leadership, corporate strategy and communications.

To better grasp the concept, the Chinese firm’s top executives spent three days in discussions with the professor, Techpool's COO...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Scrip for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from China

More from Focus On Asia

Crisis Or Opportunity? US MFN Policy Could Test Japan’s Appetite For Reforms

 
• By 

While the adoption of most favored nation drug pricing in the US stands to affect Japanese biopharma firms now heavily reliant on this market, it might also present an opportunity for pricing and policy reforms at home.

Pharma’s Space Trails Entering Transformative Era - Keytruda’s Been There

 

Merck and Lilly are among the leading pharma players using space-based research to power drug development. From reusable satellites to process drugs in low earth orbit to biomanufacturing labs experts discuss R&D opportunities in the starry canvas above.

Chinese Biotech VC/PE Fundings Rise But Still Modest

 

LTZ Therapeutics and Beijing Sungen Biomedical are among the Chinese biotechs raising new funding, of around $40m each, based on their clinical assets with novel mechanisms of action. While fundings have risen, they remain moderate however.