Current in vivo and in vitro models can't keep up with the demand for the safety assessment of large numbers of compounds emerging from high-throughput strategies. Pharmaceutical companies and start-ups are therefore building new systems that they hope will be capable of predicting the toxicity liabilities of new compounds. Cheminformatics can help week out toxic compounds at the lead selection and optimization stage; toxicogenomics may provide a toxicity diagnostic capability at all stages of drug development. For both toxicology approaches, there is not yet enough high quality data to build predictive models. Toxicology-focused cheminformatics programs attempt to consolidate data from hitherto untapped sources; toxicogenomics companies are engaged in the fussy and expensive process of manufacturing data from scratch and validating them with biological experiments.
by Mary Stuart
As the song by Bob Dylan says, "You can't win with a losing hand." Dealt by R&D with a toxic...
Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Scrip for daily insights
Already a subscriber?
The drugmaker presented data from its Phase I study of JNJ-79635322 at ASCO and EHA showing a 100% response rate in BCMA- and GPRC5D-naïve patients.
Antibody-drug conjugates are a major part of the oncology pipeline, and data presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology meeting highlight the emergence of new technologies.
Oral RNA splicing modulator has gone into a Phase II/III trial
The company said it intends to maintain a focus on rare neuromuscular disease with apitegromab but could consider partnering in obesity.
The US firm was already looking to compete in ulcerative colitis, but now expands its ambitions by moving into rheumatoid arthritis as well.
The country’s life sciences investment head tells Scrip that it is business as usual for the sector despite the rumblings from across the Atlantic.
Wales-based group launches with $140m series A.
