Issues Abound Tracking Efficacy And Effectiveness In Clinical Trials

A recent JAMA paper assesses the progress of ClinicalTrials.gov, concluding that concerns continue around the use of best methods for generating evidence and the capacity of the clinical trials enterprise to supply the high quality evidence needed to ensure confidence in guidelines. That these issues hold for interventional trials suggests that other strands of clinical research, notably those focused on comparative effectiveness, face similar if not even greater challenges to be able to provide meaningful real-world evidence.

A recent assessment of characteristics of the clinical trials recorded in the US-based registry ClinicalTrials.gov raises questions about the best methods for generating evidence as well as the capacity of clinical trials to supply sufficient amounts of high quality evidence needed to ensure confidence in guideline recommendations. Now armed with this increased level of data from the registry, the study’s authors conclude that the desire to provide high quality evidence for medical decisions must include consideration of a comprehensive redesign of the clinical trials enterprise. That these issues hold for interventional trials suggests that other strands of clinical research, notably those focused on comparative effectiveness, face similar if not even greater challenges to be able to provide meaningful real-world evidence.

“We now have the ability to comprehensively look at the [clinical trials] system, which has never existed before,” says Robert...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Scrip for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Clinical Trials

Santen Sees Potential In Myopia Market After Ryjunea Approval

 
• By 

The low-dose atropine eye drop slowed the progression of pediatric myopia by 30%.

Will Pfizer Walk Away From Arvinas After PROTAC Disappointment?

 

Arvinas and Pfizer have just filed the potential first-in-class protein degrader vepdegestrant, but its diminished commercial prospects after mixed Phase III data mean Pfizer could exit.

Lyra Eyes US Filing For LYR-210 After Surprise ENLIGHTEN 2 Win

 

In a turn of fortunes, Lyra Therapeutics has reported positive Phase III results for LYR-210 in chronic rhinosinusitis, boosting hopes for US approval. The company plans to submit an NDA and pursue further trials, but its cash position is precarious.

Deal Build-Up Amid Early ‘Deep’ Response For IGI’s Trispecific In Myeloma

 

IGI CEO tells Scrip about the “very encouraging” feedback at ASCO to promising early data for the firm's first-in-class investigational trispecific antibody in multiple myeloma. Is a licensing deal in the offing?

More from R&D

New Regenxbio DMD Data Support Gene Therapy Accelerated Approval

 
• By 

Regenxbio reported functional and biomarker data from an ongoing study of RGX-202, which it hopes to file for approval in Duchenne muscular dystrophy in 2026.

ASCO: Kite’s Dual-Targeting CAR-Ts Could Mitigate Toxicity, Resistance

 

Gilead’s Kite division presented Phase I data for its next-generation CAR-T therapy KITE-363 in patients with B-cell lymphomas.

Europe’s Drugmakers Lament EU Pharma Package

 
• By 

EFPIA says reforms make the continent less attractive for innovative firms.