OPPI’s Matai On Section 3(d) Of India’s Patent Regulations: Now’s The Time To Open Up

Industry Group’s Head Shares Views In Audio Interview

Anil Matai, director general, Organization of Pharmaceutical Producers of India, talks in this audio interview about the evolving intellectual property landscape in India post the 2024 amendments, including long-standing sticking points such as Section 3(d) of India’s patent regulations and innovator firms' experience of the Bolar provision. There’s also a "compelling reason" to consider regulatory data protection, he claims.

Anil Matai, director general, OPPI
(OPPI)

“The needle has moved,” declares Anil Matai, director general of the Organization of Pharmaceutical Producers of India (OPPI), describing India’s evolving intellectual property rights regime, which saw the enactment of some key amendments last year. The OPPI essentially represents the interests of foreign firms in India.

In this audio interview/podcast with Scrip, Matai outlines how things are playing out on the ground in areas like pre-grant oppositions and also discusses some of the long-standing sticking points including restrictions on patent-eligible subject matter under Section 3(d) of India’s patent regulations.

Section 3(d) was at the core of a 2013 Supreme Court ruling in India that turned down a patent for Novartis’s cancer drug Glivec (imatinib mesylate).

Matai, who’s worked in leadership roles across both Indian and foreign pharma multinationals, also underscored the need for regulatory data protection (RDP). “RDP to me is a no-brainer,” Matai asserted, citing how China has been able to draw global pharma investment and also moved way ahead of India in the biologics space.

China’s National Medical Products Administration, for the first time, recently outlined specific time periods of data exclusivity for different drug categories, opening up the draft proposal to public comment. While China’s Regulations for the Implementation of the Drug Administration Law included provisions for the protection of drug regulatory data in 2002, it lagged behind in implementation and lacked detailed guidelines, experts at the American multinational law firm Arnold & Porter observed in a recent advisory note.

Data exclusivity (DE) has been contentious issue in India, with innovator firms long interpreting obligations under Art 39.3 of the TRIPS (Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights) Agreement as requiring member states to provide DE, with flexibility only to determine the period of exclusivity.

Art 39.3 essentially binds member states to protect undisclosed data required to be submitted for approval of pharmaceutical and agricultural chemical products against unfair commercial use, when such products are new chemical entities. India, though, sees DE as a TRIPS-plus measure (DE is not currently provided for in Indian regulations), with generic industry and public health experts, among other arguments, asserting that the obligation referred to is confidentiality and data protection, not exclusivity.

Big pharma chiefs like Eli Lilly’s CEO, David Ricks have recently underscored that India will need to rethink certain historical positions in areas like IPR and also transform the regulatory environment to “join the globe as a leader in life sciences.”

Both Section 3(d) and concerns around protecting against the unfair commercial use, and unauthorized disclosure, of undisclosed test or other data generated to obtain marketing approval for pharmaceutical and agricultural chemical products, are part of the United States Trade Representative’s Special 301 report, where India remains on the Priority Watch List in 2025, as does China.

The US and India hope to negotiate the first tranche of a multi-sector Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) by fall of 2025 and it will be interesting to see if any of the contentious IPR issues feature therein.

Time Stamps

00:09 Introduction

04:32 Drug discovery journey, sustained financial/scientific investment & effective IP framework

06:27 Global and India product launch timeline gap

09:04 Amended Patent rules & changes brought about in pre-grant opposition process

09:50 Hope India’s IPR rules get further amended

10:56 Statutory situation with respect to compulsory license remains onerous

13:12 Need more IPR benches in courts

15: 56 Section 3(d)… now’s the time that India must open up

17:19 ‘RDP is not a patent issue’

19:24 EU- patents are enforced in a meaningful manner

20:25 India doesn’t stand chance to catch up with China in biologics, RDP is a ‘no brainer’

22:12 Bolar provision -past experience of member companies

24:24 AI and IP requirements

28:30 Geopolitical shifts reshaping business strategies

This and all our other podcasts are available on the Citeline channel on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, SoundCloud, TuneIn and Spotify Podcasts, and via smart speakers if one of these platforms has been set up as your default podcast provider.

More from India

Sun On Leqselvi US Launch Ahead, MFN Pricing And Pipeline Changes

 

Sun readies US debut of Leqselvi for alopecia areata, while PD-L1 inhibitor Unloxcyt is in the line up once the Checkpoint Therapeutics deal is completed. Management also discusses limited clarity on President Trump’s most favored nation pricing push, pipeline tweaks and M&A outlook.

Pharma Women’s Workforce In India: Weak Start, Promotions, C-Suite Drop Off

 

McKinsey senior partner Vivek Pandit talks to Scrip about some of the intricacies underlying the key findings of a study on pharma’s workforce gender gap in India. Women’s representation starts low at entry level, peaks at senior manager positions and falls off again for C-suite roles, this found.

Zydus To Continue Mirabegron Sales, Looks To World-First Dual Shigella-Typhoid Vaccine

 
• By 

Zydus expects strong mirabegron sales in FY26 amid US litigation even as it builds a growth pillar in vaccines with a world-first, Gates Foundation-aided dual shigella-typhoid vaccine under development and others on the WHO prequalified list

Lupin CEO On Trump’s Most Favored Nation Policy, Tariffs, Firm’s Five-Year Plan

 
• By 

Lupin CEO Vinita Gupta speaks on Trump’s most favored nation policy, the Inflation Reduction Act’s “pill penalty” and other developments in the US, a major market for the company. The company also outlines a five-year plan focused on complex generics and technology platforms.

More from Podcasts

Quick Listen: Scrip’s Five Must-Know Things

 
• By 

In this week's episode: AstraZeneca CEO cautions Europe; Pfizer CEO optimistic on US tariffs, pricing; Merck & Co reassures on pipeline; Merck KGaA buys SpringWorks; and Akeso explains ivonescimab overall survival data.

OPPI’s Matai On Section 3(d) Of India’s Patent Regulations: Now’s The Time To Open Up

 

Anil Matai, director general, Organization of Pharmaceutical Producers of India, talks in this audio interview about the evolving intellectual property landscape in India post the 2024 amendments, including long-standing sticking points such as Section 3(d) of India’s patent regulations and innovator firms' experience of the Bolar provision. There’s also a "compelling reason" to consider regulatory data protection, he claims.

Scrip M&A Podcast: Will FDA Staff Cuts Impact Biopharma Dealmaking?

 
• By 

Attorneys Andrew Goodman and Alan Minsk, as well as Naya CEO Daniel Teper, discussed the ramifications of US FDA staff cuts on M&A activity with Scrip senior writer Joseph Haas.