Root Cause Analysis A Key Element Of FDA’s ‘Case For Quality’
• By Shawn M. Schmitt
CDRH is highlighting poor root cause analysis as part of its “Case for Quality,” an initiative that encourages companies to make quality assurance an organization-wide concern. Since FDA directed firms in 2009 to write FDA-483 response letters within 15 workdays after an inspection, the agency has been concerned that companies might feel compelled to fix every citation listed on the inspection form quickly without considering root causes. “What we are worried about is that this perceived need to respond in such a manner may prevent firms from taking time for a greater root cause assessment of the systemic problems that gave rise to the FDA-483 citations,” CDRH Office of Compliance Director Steven Silverman said. The Case for Quality will also examine how companies are inspected and how to make device quality data more accessible to firms.
It’s not unusual for device manufacturers to display tunnel vision after receiving an FDA-483 inspection form, focusing only on quickly fixing the noted violations and failing to dig deeper to discover root causes.
Companies “often concentrate their efforts on addressing quality system citations to the exclusion of systemic fixes,” said Steven Silverman, director...
Read the full article – start your free trial today!
Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Medtech Insight for daily insights
“RRAs are valuable oversight tools and under certain circumstances, can assist FDA in its mission to protect public health, oversee regulated industry, and help ensure regulated products comply with FDA requirements,” according to final guidance.
HHS and its agencies violated the law by swiftly implementing “sweeping and poorly thought-through directives that ordered the bulk removal of healthcare resources,” including FDA draft guidances on diversity action plans and sex differences in clinical trials, a federal court said.
Stay current on regulatory guidelines from around the world with Medtech Insight's Guidance Tracker. Over 50 documents have been posted on the tracker since its last update.
Former HHS-OIG attorney Rob DeConti emphasized the significance of data analytics and compliance in combating healthcare fraud, urging medical tech companies to adopt robust measures to prevent potential risks.
An upcoming US FDA advisory panel meeting will discuss adding a new indication to allow dermal fillers to be used in the upper chest, or décolletage. Plastic surgeons expect this could drive interest in the procedure, which is already performed off-label.
A system of pre-regulatory review consultations for innovative drugs and devices in South Korea has contributed to the accelerated development of such products.
HHS and its agencies violated the law by swiftly implementing “sweeping and poorly thought-through directives that ordered the bulk removal of healthcare resources,” including FDA draft guidances on diversity action plans and sex differences in clinical trials, a federal court said.