‘Paradoxical’ FDA Recalls Report Credits Industry Collaboration For Improved Quality, But Uncovers Troubling Data About Older Devices
• By Shawn M. Schmitt
Medical devices on the market for more than five years are recalled more often than younger ones, according to a recent FDA 10-year retrospective report on corrections and removals. “There is an intuitive appeal to the argument that devices that come to the market in an early point in their lifespan – say, the first year – are more likely to be subject to recalls, but that is simply not true,” CDRH Office of Compliance Director Steven Silverman says. Other notable report findings: troubles with components and software are the leading causes for most recalls; problems with AEDs, ventilators and infusion pumps have triggered an increase in high-risk class I recalls; and domestic manufacturers recall products at a much greater volume than those outside the United States.
FDA’s device center is scratching its head after an internal report concluded that the bulk of products recalled since 2010 are medical devices that have been sold to consumers for more than half a decade.
Innovative Healthcare is asking for a permanent injunction against Johnson & Johnson subsidiary Biosense Webster after winning a $442 million antitrust verdict. The injunction aims to prevent continued anticompetitive practices in the electrophysiology catheter market.
16 June marked the first major new regulatory instrument in the UK’s post-Brexit transition to a standalone device regulatory system for Great Britain.
With new regulations limiting the use of plastics popping up worldwide, the medtech industry sees arguments on both sides. Some argue hasty bans of PFAS ("forever chemicals") would harm patients, while others say phthalates should be phased out to protect the public.
