The Patient Perspective: Upcoming US FDA Device Center Studies Put Device-Users In Front Seat

A patient's point of view is paramount as the Center for Devices and Radiological Health embarks on a plan to conduct patient-perspective studies to ascertain what device-users want and value when it comes to health care. But don't call it a "survey" – "this is real research," CDRH compliance chief Robin Newman says.

Nothing to be scared of! Professional male surgeon wearing protective uniform looking at the camera with surgical instruments in his hands surgical lamp on the background copyspace doctor medical job

Engaging with patients continues to be a top priority for US FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health as it tries to determine what device-users want and value when it comes to health care.

Robin Newman, director of the Office of Compliance within CDRH, says "the only way we're really going to know is...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Medtech Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Regulation

More from Policy & Regulation

MHRA’s Tallon Hails PMS Regulation As Start Of UK Device Framework Transformation

 
• By 

16 June marked the first major new regulatory instrument in the UK’s post-Brexit transition to a standalone device regulatory system for Great Britain.

Increasing Safety Concerns Spur Scrutiny of Device Plastics Use

 
• By 

With new regulations limiting the use of plastics popping up worldwide, the medtech industry sees arguments on both sides. Some argue hasty bans of PFAS ("forever chemicals") would harm patients, while others say phthalates should be phased out to protect the public.

With LDT Rule DOA, Could FDA Shift Focus To RUOs?

 

Now that the US FDA has chosen not to appeal a March ruling effectively killing the agency’s efforts to regulate lab-developed tests as medical devices, will the agency adopt a different strategy to flex its regulatory muscle?