Unlocking Legalities: False-Claim Standards Continue To Evolve

The finer points of when exactly the US government can collect from a device company for selling it a bill of goods are under reconsideration, even as the fast pace of False Claims Act suits continues, attorneys with law firm Gibson Dunn concluded during a series of recent webinars.

GoldKeyInPuzzle_1200x675

Can a manufacturer be held liable for violating the US False Claims Act if it never directly lied to the government? Some recent court cases suggest it’s possible, attorneys say.

The question was raised by the US Supreme Court’s 2016 Escobar decision, which held that a company could be held...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Medtech Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Legal & IP

Former Top OIG Attorney Gives Inside Look At Fraud Prevention

 
• By 

Former HHS-OIG attorney Rob DeConti emphasized the significance of data analytics and compliance in combating healthcare fraud, urging medical tech companies to adopt robust measures to prevent potential risks.

DME And Diagnostics In Crosshairs As DOJ ‘Follows The Money’

 
• By 

The DOJ has launched nearly 70 enforcement actions in 2025, targeting diagnostics, durable medical equipment, and telehealth fraud. Key cases involve significant fraudulent claims against Medicare, with individuals facing severe penalties.

Mexico’s New Procurement Rules Aim To Increase Healthcare Investment, But May Face Legal Trouble

 

Legal experts warn, however, that new Mexican procurement rules are discriminatory and could be challenged in the courts.

Innovative Wants Injunction Against J&J Subsidiary After $442M Antitrust Verdict

 
• By 

Innovative Healthcare is asking for a permanent injunction against Johnson & Johnson subsidiary Biosense Webster after winning a $442 million antitrust verdict. The injunction aims to prevent continued anticompetitive practices in the electrophysiology catheter market.

More from Policy & Regulation