No Eudamed, No Problem! Latest Guidance Explains Alternatives While Database Is Built

Lack of an official explanation about how the exchange of critical information will progress pending the launch of the EU’s medical device database, Eudamed3, has left many confused. New guidance lights the way forward.

Traffic lights

Clarification about how the various actors, manufacturers, notified bodies and competent authorities should exchange information in the context of the Medical Device Regulation, pending the official launch of the new version of the Eudamed database, is now available. The Medical Device Coordination Group (MDCG) has endorsed a 31-page guidance on harmonized administrative practices and alternative technical solutions (MDCG 2021-1).

Eudamed Timeframe

Eudamed provides the framework to enable the much-demanded transparency in the new regulatory system. It cannot fully apply until all six inter-related modules are ready.

It was originally foreseen that it would be up and running May 2020. But now, it is not due to be officially launched until 26 May 2022, the date of the full application of the IVD Regulation, and exactly one year after the delayed MDR fully applies.

Even after launch, there is a transition period allowing actors in the sector another six months after publication of the notice in the Official Journal of the EU declaring the database fully functional until they need to fully comply. (Requirements set out in MDR Articles 29(4) relating to the registration of devices, and Article 56(5) relating to notified body certificates will fully apply 24 months after the notice.)

In the meantime, and to assist companies in already becoming compliant as far as possible with the new database, parts of Eudamed are being launched on a voluntary basis. Until Eudamed is fully functional and the official notice has been published the use of these parts Eudamed remains voluntary.

More from Europe

Under Pressure: How To Safeguard The EU Responsible Person

 

The roles and responsibilities of EU medtech’s persons responsible for regulatory compliance vary widely in role and risk exposure. The recent TEAM-PRRC meeting highlighted how vulnerable they can be and the steps to protect themselves.

Number of Persons Responsible For Regulatory Compliance Grows Nearly 10%

 

The EU’s Medical Device and IVD Regulations require every manufacturer and authorized representative to have a PRRC. As compliance becomes mandatory for increasing numbers of manufacturers, figures are soaring and this role is becoming both increasingly distinctive and more complex.

Italy’s Responsible Person Sanctions Approach Raises Eyebrows

 

Fines are a fact of life when it comes to manufacturers’ compliance with EU rules on persons responsible for regulatory compliance. But Italy’s stance adds pressure on individuals appointed to the role.

UK MHRA Deepens AI Regulatory Expertise As Airlock Moves Into Phase 2

 
• By 

The first-of-its-kind sandbox for insights on how to regulate artificial intelligence in healthcare has accepted seven more AI innovators onto its learning program.

More from Geography

Italy’s Responsible Person Sanctions Approach Raises Eyebrows

 

Fines are a fact of life when it comes to manufacturers’ compliance with EU rules on persons responsible for regulatory compliance. But Italy’s stance adds pressure on individuals appointed to the role.

A Trillion On The Table. Addressing Disparities In Women’s Health Isn’t Just Right. It’s Smart.

 

Advocates spanning the spectrum of women’s health met in Manhattan to discuss the gender disparities that remain in healthcare and how public policy can correct them and the enormous ROI investors in women’s health can potentially reap.

US FDA Warning Letters - Sept.-Oct. 2025

The US FDA issued eight warning letters in September and October, with ultrasound, surgical and mobile apps among the affected product types.