Theranos Cases Show How DoJ Looks Beyond The FDCA In Prosecuting Drug, Device Companies

Charges under wire fraud statute carry higher maximum prison sentences and are easier to explain than FDCA misbranding charges, Department of Justice officials say in dissecting the guilty verdicts and lengthy prison sentences for former leaders of the failed blood testing start-up.

Man with telescope
Department of Justice is increasingly looking beyond the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act in bringing criminal charges against regulated companies. • Source: Shutterstock

Guilty verdicts and lengthy prison sentences for the two former leaders of the failed blood testing start-up Theranos Inc. show the advantage for prosecutors in bringing charges outside the federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, current and former Department of Justice officials said.

Allegations of fraud and conspiracy involving firms and products regulated by the Food and Drug Administration can be easier for...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Medtech Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Legal & IP

Final Curtain For LDTs? FDA Will Not Appeal District Court Decision To Vacate Final Rule

 

The US FDA has given up on its effort to regulate lab-developed tests as medical devices, at least for now. The agency will not appeal a decision from the Eastern District of Texas that tossed out the FDA’s final rule, leaving the agency with few cards.

State And International Enforcement Agencies May Step Up Amid Uncertain Federal Environment

 
• By 

States and international regulatory bodies may increase their US enforcement role following federal staff cuts, Hyman Phelps & McNamara attorneys said in a recent webinar. The attorneys also expect False Claims Act enforcement and public health to remain key areas of focus at the federal level.

FDA And Boston Scientific Face Legal Action Over Spinal Device Safety

 
• By 

A patient, Dena Lawler, is suing Boston Scientific and the US FDA over alleged harm from a spinal stimulator device. Lawler claims inadequate regulatory review allowed dangerous modifications to the device, which then caused her pain and other health issues. She is calling for reconsideration of the device approvals.

California Medtech Firms Resolve Patent Dispute Over Delivery Catheters

 

Route 92 says it has reached a settlement with Q’Apel Medical over patent claims concerning its Tenzing delivery catheters.

More from Policy & Regulation

Permanent FDA Top Lawyer Expected After HHS Counsel Confirmation

 
• By 

Robert Foster, HHS deputy general counsel and chief counsel for food, research and drugs, is temporarily heading the Office of Chief Counsel, but a permanent appointee is expected after Michael Stuart's confirmation as HHS general counsel.

FDA Drops Package Labeling Guidance For Hernia Mesh Manufacturers

 

The US FDA recently published a draft guidance document for manufacturers of mesh products that are used during several types of hernia repair procedures.

Medtechs Wait For Dividend As UK Spending Review Prioritizes Healthcare And NHS

 
• By 

Increased support for NHS services and delivery infrastructure announced in the 11 June government spending review by chancellor of the exchequer Rachel Reeves could boost inward investment and offer new market opportunities for medtechs.