Invalid! The Supreme Court Questions the Basis for Diagnostic Patents

The Supreme Court has decided to hear a case--LabCorp. vs Metabolite--that could invalidate patents based on the correlation between natural biological markers, like proteins or genes, and a disease. The case strikes at the heart of the new diagnostics start-ups-and could also invalidate a host of pharmaceutical IP strategies.

"I don't like to be alarmist," says Vern Norveil, a partner at Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, "but this case could be a disaster for the industry if the [Supreme Court] goes too far." The industry is diagnostics—and specifically the burgeoning world of diagnostic start-ups. The case—due to be heard in March—goes to the very heart of the new biomarker-based diagnostics industry: whether a patent on the correlation between natural biological markers, like proteins or genes, and a disease is valid.

The story's beginnings didn't appear portentous. A predecessor company of Competitive Technologies Inc. , a firm which buys and...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Scrip for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Legal & IP

Regeneron Wins PCSK9 Court Battle Against Amgen

 

A federal court jury found Amgen liable for violating antitrust laws in allegedly preventing Praluent from competing against Repatha.

Which Firms Are Most Exposed To Prasad’s Possible Accelerated Approvals Clampdown?

 

Vaccine and accelerated approvals are expected to face greater scrutiny under new CBER leader Vinay Prasad, but he has promised “no light switch change” to policy, giving some reassurance to companies whose share prices have been battered.

OPPI’s Matai On Section 3(d) Of India’s Patent Regulations: Now’s The Time To Open Up

 

Anil Matai, director general, Organization of Pharmaceutical Producers of India, talks in this audio interview about the evolving intellectual property landscape in India post the 2024 amendments, including long-standing sticking points such as Section 3(d) of India’s patent regulations and innovator firms' experience of the Bolar provision. There’s also a "compelling reason" to consider regulatory data protection, he claims.

NIH Funding Cut Left Less Money On R&D Table, Tariffs Would Add To Woes: Aragen’s CEO

 
• By 

Funding cuts at the National Institutes of Health, big pharma’s US onshoring moves, GCC partnerships and talks with the Indian government to solve intellectual property challenges are discussed in an interview with Aragen’s CEO, who is also keenly watching the Trump administration’s moves on pharma tariffs

More from Business

Finance Watch: Insmed Cashes In On Positive Data With $750m Offering

 
• By 

Public Company Edition: Insmed raised $750m after reporting positive Phase IIb data in PAH, Cogent accessed up to $400m in new debt, Kelun-Biotech netted $250m in a placement of shares and ADC revealed a $100m private placement. In strategic updates, Recursion cut 20% of its jobs.

Lilly Looks For Muscle-Sparing Candidates In Pact With Juvena

 
• By 

Deal Snapshot: Including its internal efforts with bimagrumab, Lilly has been seeking a muscle-sparing therapy to complement GLP-1 obesity drugs, such as Zepbound.

Asia Deal Watch: Otsuka’s Taiho Licenses LSD1 Inhibitor Rights To Benz

Plus deals involving BioAge/JiKang, Sanyou/Medicovestor, AriBio/Acino, Intragrand/Transpire, Kaken/Twocells, Sumitomo/Novo Nordisk, NIBEC/Undisclosed, Formosa/Adalvo, Drug Farm/Amoytop, Lupin/SteinCares and Lupin/Honeywell.