1. Medtech Insight
  2. >>Policy & Regulation
  3. >>Legal & IP

DNA Patent Question Tossed Back To Lower Court

In the wake of the high court’s ruling in Mayo v. Prometheus, the Supreme Court orders the Federal Circuit to reconsider its decision that Myriad Genetics’ isolated BRCA genes are patentable.

The Supreme Court sent the Myriad Genetics Inc. gene patent case back to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, leaving it to the lower court to flesh out how the high court’s unanimous ruling in Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories Inc. applies to isolated DNA molecules.

On March 26, the court granted a petition by the American Civil Liberties Union and the Public Patent Foundation asking the court to review their challenge of Myriad’s gene patents,...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Medtech Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required
Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber?

More from Legal & IP

Final Curtain For LDTs? FDA Will Not Appeal District Court Decision To Vacate Final Rule

 
• By Brian Bossetta

The US FDA has given up on its effort to regulate lab-developed tests as medical devices, at least for now. The agency will not appeal a decision from the Eastern District of Texas that tossed out the FDA’s final rule, leaving the agency with few cards.

State And International Enforcement Agencies May Step Up Amid Uncertain Federal Environment

 
• By Elizabeth Orr

States and international regulatory bodies may increase their US enforcement role following federal staff cuts, Hyman Phelps & McNamara attorneys said in a recent webinar. The attorneys also expect False Claims Act enforcement and public health to remain key areas of focus at the federal level.

FDA And Boston Scientific Face Legal Action Over Spinal Device Safety

 
• By Elizabeth Orr

A patient, Dena Lawler, is suing Boston Scientific and the US FDA over alleged harm from a spinal stimulator device. Lawler claims inadequate regulatory review allowed dangerous modifications to the device, which then caused her pain and other health issues. She is calling for reconsideration of the device approvals.

California Medtech Firms Resolve Patent Dispute Over Delivery Catheters

 
• By Brian Bossetta

Route 92 says it has reached a settlement with Q’Apel Medical over patent claims concerning its Tenzing delivery catheters.

More from Policy & Regulation

First AI Breast Cancer Prediction Platform Receives FDA Authorization

 
• By Natasha Barrow

Clairity’s "first-in-class" mammography-based AI screening tool, Clairity Breast, provides "equitable risk assessments," expanding access to lifesaving early detection for breast cancer, said company founder Connie Lehman.

Final Curtain For LDTs? FDA Will Not Appeal District Court Decision To Vacate Final Rule

 
• By Brian Bossetta

The US FDA has given up on its effort to regulate lab-developed tests as medical devices, at least for now. The agency will not appeal a decision from the Eastern District of Texas that tossed out the FDA’s final rule, leaving the agency with few cards.

Abbott Announces FDA Approval Of Tendyne Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement System

 
• By Marion Webb

Abbott received the US FDA nod for its Tendyne system, offering a minimally invasive alternative to replace the valves of patients with severe mitral valve disease who are at risk for open-heart surgery.