New Technologies for Infertility

The infertility market has historically been dominated by drugs. There have been few product opportunities on the medtech side, which has consisted of commodity products like syringes, petri dishes and microscopes. But that is changing; recently several new companies have been founded with technologies to improve the success rates of in vitro fertilization. VCs have also come to realize that infertility represents a premium, self-pay market for elective procedures.

At a conference recently, two VCs met at the break. One said to the other, "I have a new infertility company." The other threw up his hands in a gesture of refusal and said, "I don’t think so." Such has been, historically, the investment community’s reaction to the market for assisted reproductive technologies, despite the fact that infertility affects 10 to 18% of married couples in industrially developed countries, and infertility clinics operate in a $10 billion worldwide market. In the past, there has really been no entry point for start-up companies. Pharmaceutical companies have a small share of the market; a $1.5 billion infertility drug market is dominated by Merck Serono SA (part of Merck KGAA ), Schering-Plough Corp. , Ferring Pharmaceuticals AS , Sanofi Aventis, and Novartis AG . However, few product opportunities have existed on the medtech side, which is largely made up of commodity products like catheters, syringes, Petri dishes, and standard microscopes. As a market, infertility has further suffered in the investment community by its association with women’s health, which has historically not been a hot spot of investing.

Acknowledging the infertility industry’s shadowy past, the first venture capitalist says to the second, "No, really. You should take a...

More from Archive

Final Chance To Have Your Say: Take Our Reader Survey This Week

 
• By 

Editor’s note: This is your final call to participate in the survey to better understand our subscribers’ content and delivery needs. The deadline is 20 September.

Shape Our Content: Take The Reader Survey

 
• By 

Editor’s note: We are conducting a survey to better understand our subscribers’ content and delivery needs. If there are any changes you’d like to see in coverage topics, content format or the method in which you receive and access Medtech Insight, or if you love it how it is, now is the time to have your voice heard.

Patients With Movement Disorders Will Benefit From Medtronic’s Expanded MRI Labeling For DBS

 
• By 

Medtronic announced it received expanded MRI labeling for its DBS systems, which is critical, given that almost 70% of all DBS-eligible patients will likely need an MRI at some point in their care, says Ashwini Sharan, CMO for Medtronic Neuromodulation.

Podcast: Lung Life AI CEO Shares Regulatory And Reimbursement Journey For Lung Cancer Diagnostic

 

In this episode, Medtech Insight reporter Natasha Barrow speaks to LungLife AI CEO Paul Pagano. Lung Life AI is a US-based AIM-listed medical technology company that has developed a liquid biopsy test for the early detection of lung cancer called Lung LB. Pagano runs through the highlights of Lung Life AI journey to date and its future ambition for a strategic partnership. He also provides advice to similar diagnostic companies seeking reimbursement andcompliance with the US FDA Lab Developed Test ruling.

More from Medtech Insight

Thena Capital’s New Fund Up And Running With £1M Investment In Plexāā’s Breast Cancer Device

 

Thena Capital, the first UK-based early-stage specialist medtech firm, has made its first investment since closing its £50m fund. Medtech Insight spoke with general partner Pamela Walker Geddes to gain insight into Thena Capital’s investment strategy.

Execs On The Move: June 23–27, 2025

 
• By 

An interactive look at recent executive-level company changes and promotions in the medical device and diagnostics industries.

Court Orders US FDA To Return Trial Diversity Action Plan Guidance To Website

 
• By 

HHS and its agencies violated the law by swiftly implementing “sweeping and poorly thought-through directives that ordered the bulk removal of healthcare resources,” including FDA draft guidances on diversity action plans and sex differences in clinical trials, a federal court said.