LDR’s IPO Bid, FDA OKs Give Spine Much Needed Adjustment

The spine device firm LDR filed to raise up to $69 million in an initial public offering just as it gained FDA approval for its Mobi-C cervical disc for one- and two-level indications. Device investors will keep a close watch on the IPO, as one has not been staged by a venture-backed spine start-up since 2007.

Medical device VCs have had to sit on the sidelines while biopharma VCs saw their start-ups make their way onto the public markets through initial public offerings of stock. But last month’s filing by LDR Holding Corp. could give device investors something to cheer about. No venture-backed spine start-up has staged a successful initial public offering in the US since TranS1 Inc. went public in 2007. [See Deal] The Austin, TX-based company, also known as LDR Spine, looking to end the drought, filed to raise up to $69 million from public investors. [See Deal]

LDR comes to public investors with an established business of selling its VerteBRIDGE fusion platform used in cervical and lumbar spine fusion procedures. Introduced in 2007, VerteBRIDGE products have been employed in more than 30,000 surgeries, according to the company. In addition to the fusion market, LDR now can dive into the crowded cervical disc replacement sector

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Medtech Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Europe

MedTech Europe’s Bisazza Urges Action As US Tariffs Jeopardize Critical Global Supply Chains

 

The intricate assembly of medical devices, often involving over 1,000 globally sourced components, faces severe disruption due to new US tariffs. These barriers could halt production and devastate small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), MedTech Europe’s CEO, Oliver Bisazza, warns in an interview with Medtech Insight.

UK Medtech Regulators Must Ensure Certainty So Businesses Can Plan Their Futures

 
• By 

With medtech businesses typically managing investment cycles on a three- to five-year basis, local regulatory processes and forward costs of market entry must offer an attractive environment in which companies can plan for growth, says McDermott Will and Emery’s partner and head of healthcare and life sciences, Sharon Lamb. Broad-scale improvements to NICE’s evaluation offerings would similarly enhance the UK’s value to innovators.

Faster Device Certification Among Keys To Unlocking Innovation In EU MedTech Sector

 

While MedTech Europe sharpens its focus on what the EU most urgently needs to advance the medtech market in four targeted measures, the European Commission has also unveiled four priorities for 2025.

Will NICE’s New Medtech Evaluation Plans Hit the Target for Patients and Industry?

 
• By 

One year after the UK mooted the Rules-Based Pathway to give medtechs clarity on what can be expected from an evaluation, the devices industry says UK healthtech assessment and adoption processes are still failing to meet the needs of innovators and patients.

More from Geography

Faster Device Certification Among Keys To Unlocking Innovation In EU MedTech Sector

 

While MedTech Europe sharpens its focus on what the EU most urgently needs to advance the medtech market in four targeted measures, the European Commission has also unveiled four priorities for 2025.

Will NICE’s New Medtech Evaluation Plans Hit the Target for Patients and Industry?

 
• By 

One year after the UK mooted the Rules-Based Pathway to give medtechs clarity on what can be expected from an evaluation, the devices industry says UK healthtech assessment and adoption processes are still failing to meet the needs of innovators and patients.

The Value Of Consumer Wearables Within The Clinic Is Currently Unknown, Says Cardiologist

 

“It’s quite likely [consumer wearable manufacturers] are changing the sensitivity and specificity based on consumer feedback, but not for medical reasons,” said Dipak Kotecha, a University of Birmingham professor of cardiology. Often, self-reported performance evidence from manufacturers is “low quality and biased.”