Lobbyists Again Coordinate Device Tax Attack

AdvaMed and MDMA, two rivaling lobby groups, have again come together against a common enemy: the Obamacare medical device excise tax. The groups simultaneously released survey results that argue that permanently repealing the tax would be a boon for their member companies and innovation.

Two of the most powerful medical device lobby groups have launched what seems to be a coordinated attack in their war against the 2.3%medical device excise tax. This comes only days after a bill was reintroduced in the US House of Representatives to permanently repeal the tax.

AdvaMed and the Medical Device Manufacturers Association (MDMA) simultaneously emailed results from respective industry surveys arguing that the temporary suspension...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Medtech Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Legislation

More from Policy & Regulation

Dermal Fillers For Décolletage May Gain FDA Approval

 
• By 

An upcoming US FDA advisory panel meeting will discuss adding a new indication to allow dermal fillers to be used in the upper chest, or décolletage. Plastic surgeons expect this could drive interest in the procedure, which is already performed off-label.

South Korean Health Ministry Sees Benefits Of Pre-Regulatory Review

 
• By 

A system of pre-regulatory review consultations for innovative drugs and devices in South Korea has contributed to the accelerated development of such products.

Court Orders US FDA To Return Trial Diversity Action Plan Guidance To Website

 
• By 

HHS and its agencies violated the law by swiftly implementing “sweeping and poorly thought-through directives that ordered the bulk removal of healthcare resources,” including FDA draft guidances on diversity action plans and sex differences in clinical trials, a federal court said.