1. Medtech Insight
  2. >>Policy & Regulation
  3. >>Legal & IP

Companies Targeted By FTC Using Penalty Offense Authority Have Strong Defense, Attorney Says

 
• By Eileen Francis

John Villafranco, partner at Kelly Drye & Warren LLP, says the US FTC’s ability to obtain monetary relief using the penalty offense mechanism is questionable both on statutory and Constitutional grounds. Marketers faced with civil penalties – for example, for alleged inadequately substantiated health claims – should stand their ground, he suggests in a recent interview.

Medtech, personal care and other companies faced with potential civil penalties under the US Federal Trade Commission’s penalty offense authority have a strong defense on both statutory and Constitutional grounds, says John Villafranco, partner at Kelley Drye & Warren LLP.

“If a company were to litigate, I believe it could successfully assert a number of defenses,” Villafranco said in a...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Medtech Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required
Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber?

More from Legal & IP

Mexico’s New Procurement Rules Aim To Increase Healthcare Investment, But May Face Legal Trouble

 
• By Francesca Bruce

Legal experts warn, however, that new Mexican procurement rules are discriminatory and could be challenged in the courts.

Innovative Wants Injunction Against J&J Subsidiary After $442M Antitrust Verdict

 
• By Elizabeth Orr

Innovative Healthcare is asking for a permanent injunction against Johnson & Johnson subsidiary Biosense Webster after winning a $442 million antitrust verdict. The injunction aims to prevent continued anticompetitive practices in the electrophysiology catheter market.

Final Curtain For LDTs? FDA Will Not Appeal District Court Decision To Vacate Final Rule

 
• By Brian Bossetta

The US FDA has given up on its effort to regulate lab-developed tests as medical devices, at least for now. The agency will not appeal a decision from the Eastern District of Texas that tossed out the FDA’s final rule, leaving the agency with few cards.

State And International Enforcement Agencies May Step Up Amid Uncertain Federal Environment

 
• By Elizabeth Orr

States and international regulatory bodies may increase their US enforcement role following federal staff cuts, Hyman Phelps & McNamara attorneys said in a recent webinar. The attorneys also expect False Claims Act enforcement and public health to remain key areas of focus at the federal level.

More from Policy & Regulation

FDA Regulations ‘Lock Out’ Clinically Proven Neuromodulation Devices

 
• By Natasha Barrow

Flow Neuroscience's neuromodulation headset for the treatment of depression is approved and marketed in the EU. However, two years on, the company is still waiting for US FDA approval despite being assigned breakthrough device designation.

Guidance Details EU Approach On Medtech, AI Regulation Interplay

 
• By Amanda Maxwell

Overlapping clinical testing requirements and decision-making around significant changes to MDAI are among the tricky subjects that the new document explains.

Tarver And Makary Emphasize Commitment To At-Home Healthcare Innovations In FDA Podcast

 
• By Elizabeth Orr

FDA officials Michelle Tarver and Marty Makary discussed advancements in home healthcare during a podcast. They highlighted the importance of continuous glucose monitors, emphasized home healthcare's benefits for chronic diseases, and mentioned the agency's efforts to streamline device development.