Companies Targeted By FTC Using Penalty Offense Authority Have Strong Defense, Attorney Says

John Villafranco, partner at Kelly Drye & Warren LLP, says the US FTC’s ability to obtain monetary relief using the penalty offense mechanism is questionable both on statutory and Constitutional grounds. Marketers faced with civil penalties – for example, for alleged inadequately substantiated health claims – should stand their ground, he suggests in a recent interview.

Medtech, personal care and other companies faced with potential civil penalties under the US Federal Trade Commission’s penalty offense authority have a strong defense on both statutory and Constitutional grounds, says John Villafranco, partner at Kelley Drye & Warren LLP.

“If a company were to litigate, I believe it could successfully assert a number of defenses,” Villafranco said in a...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Medtech Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Legal & IP

Former Top OIG Attorney Gives Inside Look At Fraud Prevention

 
• By 

Former HHS-OIG attorney Rob DeConti emphasized the significance of data analytics and compliance in combating healthcare fraud, urging medical tech companies to adopt robust measures to prevent potential risks.

DME And Diagnostics In Crosshairs As DOJ ‘Follows The Money’

 
• By 

The DOJ has launched nearly 70 enforcement actions in 2025, targeting diagnostics, durable medical equipment, and telehealth fraud. Key cases involve significant fraudulent claims against Medicare, with individuals facing severe penalties.

Mexico’s New Procurement Rules Aim To Increase Healthcare Investment, But May Face Legal Trouble

 

Legal experts warn, however, that new Mexican procurement rules are discriminatory and could be challenged in the courts.

Innovative Wants Injunction Against J&J Subsidiary After $442M Antitrust Verdict

 
• By 

Innovative Healthcare is asking for a permanent injunction against Johnson & Johnson subsidiary Biosense Webster after winning a $442 million antitrust verdict. The injunction aims to prevent continued anticompetitive practices in the electrophysiology catheter market.

More from Policy & Regulation