1. Medtech Insight
  2. >>Policy & Regulation

Report: Unmet Need Can Trump Modest Data In Quest For Reimbursement

A higher level of evidence did not correlate well with subsequent payor reimbursement, according to a comparison of the coverage success for devices approved via HDE and PMA conducted by Avalere Health for the Pew Charitable Trusts. Perceptions of unmet need tended to serve a bigger factor for coverage, the report said.

Clinical need may be a bigger factor to securing reimbursement for a medical device than a preponderance of data, according to the conclusions of a recent analysis. A study commissioned by the Pew Charitable Trusts and conducted by Avalere Health found that more clinical evidence gathered before device approval does not correlate well with subsequent payor reimbursement. The findings, based on case-study analyses and interviews with insurers, were presented in a report released April 7.

“If you have a compelling enough clinical need that you are able to demonstrate utility for your device, then even...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Medtech Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required
Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber?

More from Policy & Regulation

EU Pilot Features ‘All-In-One’ Regulatory Path For Drug/Diagnostic Trials

 
• By Vibha Sharma

The EU is testing a groundbreaking “all-in-one” process for reviewing combined drug and diagnostic trials via a single application for coordinated assessment.

European Medtechs Reiterate Opposition To Reciprocal Tariffs On US Imports

 
• By Ashley Yeo

EU countermeasures against US tariffs suggest medtech categories exported to the EU could be targeted for tariffs. MedTech Europe and the German IVDs industry have stressed the negative effects this would have on patient care.

Innovative Wants Injunction Against J&J Subsidiary After $442M Antitrust Verdict

 
• By Elizabeth Orr

Innovative Healthcare is asking for a permanent injunction against Johnson & Johnson subsidiary Biosense Webster after winning a $442 million antitrust verdict. The injunction aims to prevent continued anticompetitive practices in the electrophysiology catheter market.

MHRA’s Tallon Hails PMS Regulation As Start Of UK Device Framework Transformation

 
• By Ashley Yeo

16 June marked the first major new regulatory instrument in the UK’s post-Brexit transition to a standalone device regulatory system for Great Britain.

More from Medtech Insight

Ceryx Medical Amasses £11M To Develop Adaptive Cardiac Pacing Technology

 
• By Natasha Barrow

The Development Bank of Wales and London-based Parkwalk Advisors led an investment round of £5m, almost doubling Ceryx Medical's total investment to date.

SS Innovations’ SSI Mantra 3 Poised To Challenge Da Vinci In Robotic Surgery Market

 
• By Marion Webb

SS Innovations reported its first SSi Mantra 3 robotic cardiac surgery in South America as it prepares to file for US FDA de novo clearance and a CE mark. The firm aims to challenge Intuitive Surgical with a lower-cost, flexible system targeting US and European markets.

Innovative Wants Injunction Against J&J Subsidiary After $442M Antitrust Verdict

 
• By Elizabeth Orr

Innovative Healthcare is asking for a permanent injunction against Johnson & Johnson subsidiary Biosense Webster after winning a $442 million antitrust verdict. The injunction aims to prevent continued anticompetitive practices in the electrophysiology catheter market.