Clinical need may be a bigger factor to securing reimbursement for a medical device than a preponderance of data, according to the conclusions of a recent analysis. A study commissioned by the Pew Charitable Trusts and conducted by Avalere Health found that more clinical evidence gathered before device approval does not correlate well with subsequent payor reimbursement. The findings, based on case-study analyses and interviews with insurers, were presented in a report released April 7.
“If you have a compelling enough clinical need that you are able to demonstrate utility for your device, then even...
Read the full article – start your free trial today!
Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Medtech Insight for daily insights
- Start your 7-day free trial
- Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
- Access comprehensive global coverage
- Enjoy instant access – no credit card required
Already a subscriber?