Total Joints: Bundled Payments Driving Procedural Innovation

Manufacturers bracing for CMS' new mandatory bundled payment program for total hip and knee replacement surgery may be able to breathe a sigh of relief as hospitals are expected to target post-acute-care rather than implants to bring down costs. Amid these changes, orthopedic manufacturers are helping hospitals address bundled payments by developing innovative solutions that improve procedural efficiencies, recovery times, costs and patient outcomes, including outpatient total joint surgery, robotics, custom implants, and patient-specific instrumentation.

Last year, the musculoskeletal industry was rocked by a wave of consolidation when major orthopedic heavyweights combined forces. First, Zimmer merged with Biomet in a deal valued at $13.35 billion, and Wright Medical Group Inc. teamed up with Tornier NV in a $3.3 billion all-stock transaction. [See Deal][See Deal] Now that the aftershocks have subsided and the industry has largely recovered, the topic at this year’s American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) Annual Meeting in Orlando turned to the impact new government initiatives, with the mantra of improving quality and reducing costs, would have on the delivery of orthopedic care. More specifically, the conversation centered on the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' (CMS') new bundled payment program called the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Model (CCJR)

. Starting on April 1, around 800 hospitals in 67 metropolitan statistical areas began participating in the program, which makes...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Medtech Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from United States

FDA Panel Supports Dermal Fillers For Décolletage Use

 
• By 

An FDA panel has endorsed the use of dermal fillers for décolletage, but warned of patient safety concerns. The filler can cause complications with future imaging and pregnancy or breastfeeding, panelists said. Regulatory measures and patient studies are recommended for better outcomes.

Apreo Health Raises $130M, First Patient Treated In US Clinical Trial

 

Apreo Health CEO Karun Naga talks to Medtech Insight about the company’s intentions for its Series B funding. The Breathe-3 clinical trial and early commercialization activities, involving physician education, are top priorities.

NAD Alerts Agendia Over Endorsing Physician’s Ties To Firm

 
• By 

The National Advertising Division (NAD) alerted Agendia to improve disclosure regarding a physician endorsing its MammaPrint test. The physician's ties to Agendia were inadequately revealed in LinkedIn posts.

FDA Ends Effort To Regulate LDTs By Rescinding Final Rule

 

Just a year and four months after publishing a final rule that would have allowed it to regulate laboratory developed tests as medical devices, the US FDA has rescinded the controversial measure, finally putting an end to the saga.

More from North America

Exact Sciences Reveals Thinking On CRC Liquid Biopsy After Freenome Deal

 

Exact Sciences has entered into an exclusive licensing agreement with Freenome, stipulating clinical benchmarks and a first-line rating in the USPSTF guidelines. Medtech Insight interviewed screening CMO Paul Limburg about CRC screening and Exact’s strategy on liquid biopsy.

FDA Changes Fail To Diminish US Appeal To European Medtech Industry

 

Despite staffing cuts and uncertainty at the FDA, the US still offers EU medtech firms stronger regulatory support, regulatory expert Bassil Akra told Medtech Insight. This is especially valued as EU rules are often viewed as overly stringent, unclear and difficult to follow.

Biden-Era Device Trial Snapshot Pilot Halted Amid DEI Policy Shift

 
• By 

The FDA's Device Clinical Trial Snapshot Pilot, aimed at increasing trial transparency and diversity, has been canceled following President Trump’s anti-DEI executive order. Critics warn this may hinder trial transparency, impacting public health and demographic data accessibility.