Benefit-Risk Assessment Framework Moves Toward Global Harmonization

PhRMA shifts further development of its structured benefit-risk assessment framework to the European organization CIRS, which has relationships with regulators in Europe, the U.S. and elsewhere that can drive the framework’s adoption for the drug approval process.

The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America is transferring its framework for risk-benefit assessment to the Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science Ltd. for further development on the road to harmonization of how companies and regulators evaluate drugs.

The transfer, announced Jan. 30, helps consolidate efforts to bring consistency to benefit-risk assessments across the globe

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Approval Standards

Moderna Pivots To Increase Focus On Cancer Amid US Vaccine Policy Changes

 
• By 

During its first quarter earnings call, Moderna avoided criticizing vaccine policy changes, but de-emphasized its flu/COVID-19 vaccine for those under age 50 and prioritized cancer programs.

Another Regeneron CRL Prompts Regulatory Operations Questions

 

CEO Len Schleifer said during the company’s first quarter earnings call that most of the complete response letters the company has received related to third-party suppliers, not efficacy or safety.

Postmarketing Surprise Is Latest Plot Twist For Novavax’s COVID-19 Vaccine BLA

 

Three weeks after its user fee goal date, the FDA demanded a postmarketing commitment “to generate additional data,” Novavax said.

Gene Therapy Sponsor INTERACT, Pre-IND Meeting Confusion Lingers Despite FDA Guidance

 
• By 

PhRMA questioned whether proof-of-concept studies are needed before an INTERACT meeting and said a draft guidance describing the timing of definitive toxicology studies creates confusion.

More from Pathways & Standards